Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 420/2024

Case between Deepa Ganesan et al vs Rajesh M.D regarding setting aside ex-parte decree

Court
THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. REEJA R. NAIR.
Order Date
2026-01-09
Duration
approximately-1 year 7 months
Case Closed
Fri, 01/09/2026 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The petitioners, Deepa Ganesan and Nangyarath Ayyuni Ganesh, are seeking to set aside an ex-parte decree issued against them in favor of the plaintiff, Rajesh M.D. They argue that their inability to file a written statement was due to personal difficulties and improper service of summons.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the petitioners' request to set aside the ex-parte decree, granting them an opportunity to present their case, contingent upon the payment of costs to the respondent.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Restoration of the suit on payment of costs of Rs.2,000/-
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the petitioners' request to set aside the ex-parte decree, granting them an opportunity to present their case, contingent upon the payment of costs to the respondent.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court recognized that substantial issues warranted consideration and justified granting another chance for contesting the case on merits.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
This court is of the view that one more opportunity can be afforded to the petitioners herein to contest the case on merits.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the petition is allowed on payment of costs of Rs.2,000/- (Rupees Two Thousand only) to the respondent.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Rajesh M.D
Party Age
46
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Deepa Ganesan
Party Age
40
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Nangyarath Ayyuni Ganesh
Party Age
45
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sabu Thozhuppadan K.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Fathima Haimapura
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sona Benny Vezhmbassery
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Antony Varghese
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Renjith R.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Anju Mohan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Ansil B.H.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Ajeesh Sasidharan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The petition is allowed on payment of costs of Rs.2,000/- to the respondent.
Evidence:
Hence, this court is of the opinion that these petitions can be allowed on payment of costs.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Restoration Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Deepa Ganesan et al vs Rajesh M.D regarding setting aside ex-parte decree
Case Code Year
Case between Deepa Ganesan et al vs Rajesh M.D regarding setting aside ex-parte decree

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Thu, 07/25/2024 - 12:00
Case Closed
Fri, 01/09/2026 - 12:00
From
Thu, 01/01/2026 - 12:00
To
Wed, 01/21/2026 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Latha Murali vs Subaida P et al regarding Restoration Petition
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Restoration Petition Defendant Won
Case between Union Bank Of India vs M/s Network Academy regarding realization of money.
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Restoration Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Vasudevan Pillai vs Muhammed Haneeffa C et al regarding restoration of a dismissed petition.
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Restoration Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Johny Thomas vs Shiju alias Thampi regarding recovery of money.
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Restoration Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Elsy James vs P.C Jose regarding restoration of original suit.
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Restoration Petition Plaintiff Won