Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No. 749/2015

Case between Dakshayani et al vs State of Kerala regarding declaration and Permanent Prohibitory Injunction

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Judge
Smt. Ragi.S.
Order Date
2025-08-26
Duration
approximately-10 years 9 months
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, led by Dakshayani, filed a petition to accept an additional witness schedule while the defendants, represented by the State of Kerala, objected, citing previous opportunities to submit evidence. The court found the application was intended to delay the trial.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the plaintiffs' application to accept the additional witness schedule, stating it was intended to delay the trial.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the plaintiffs' application to accept the additional witness schedule, stating it was intended to delay the trial.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiffs had ample time to submit evidence and the delay was unjustified.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Heard both sides. The suit was filed for declaration and Permanent Prohibitory Injunction. The case is of the year 2015. On 23/11/2024, the suit was listed for trial.

Judgment Evidence:

Therefore, the present application is only for the purpose of delay the trial. Furthermore, the reason for the delay in filing an additional witness did not explain in the supporting affidavit also. For the reasons stated above, this IA is dismissed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Dakshayani
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Reghunathan
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Muthayyan
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Padmavathy
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sivaprasad
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
State of Kerala
Relation
Represented by
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
V.Venugopalan Nair
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sicin G.Mundakkal
Appearance Type
Government Pleader
Law Firm
Additional Government Pleader

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
The IA has been filed by the petitioner/Addl.18th plaintiff to accept the additional witness schedule.
Evidence:
For the reasons stated above, this IA is dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Dakshayani et al vs State of Kerala regarding declaration and Permanent Prohibitory Injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Dakshayani et al vs State of Kerala regarding declaration and Permanent Prohibitory Injunction

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Thu, 01/01/2015 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Tue, 07/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Government

Similar Cases

Case between Shyamala vs Kerala State et al regarding review of order
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Nazeer vs State of Kerala et al regarding Direction and Injunction.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Radhamani Amma et al vs Kerala State et al regarding declaring the right of easement and for permanent prohibitory injunction.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Ushakumari vs State of Kerala et al regarding restoration of suit
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Mangalanandan et al vs The Government of Kerala et al regarding Mandatory injunction
IN THE COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won