Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S.. No.1281/2024

Case between C.K. Mohanan vs Antony C.J et al regarding injunction for access to property

Court
THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Judge
SMT. REEJA R. NAIR
Order Date
2025-04-10
Duration
approximately-1 year 7 months
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

C.K. Mohanan, the plaintiff, filed for an injunction against defendants Antony C.J, Saju Alias Godwin, Nisha Jhon, and Suma Jhon regarding access to a public pathway leading to his property. The defendants contended that the plaintiff lacks rights to the pathway, claiming it traverses their property and asserting alternative access is available.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court granted an injunction in favor of the plaintiff, restraining the defendants from causing obstructions to the plaintiff's access to the B schedule property. The court found that the plaintiff had established a prima facie case and the balance of convenience favored him.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Temporary injunction restraining the defendants from causing obstructions to the plaint B schedule property.
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The court granted an injunction in favor of the plaintiff, restraining the defendants from causing obstructions to the plaintiff's access to the B schedule property. The court found that the plaintiff had established a prima facie case and the balance of convenience favored him.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff established a prima facie case for the easement right over the pathway and proved the necessity for the injunction.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff established a prima facie case for the easement right over the pathway and proved the necessity for the injunction.
Supporting Evidence
The court found that prima facie case exists in favour of the plaintiff. No irreparable injury will be caused to the defendants, if the petition is allowed. Balance of convenience in this regard is also seen in favour of the plaintiffs.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the petition is allowed as follows; (I) An order of temporary injunction is passed restraining the respondents 1 and 2 from causing any obstructions to the plaint B schedule property, until the final disposal of this suit.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
C.K. Mohanan
Party Age
71
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Antony C.J
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Saju Alias Godwin
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Nisha Jhon
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Suma Jhon
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
P.K. Ibrahim
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Reeha Khader K.
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Anaz Bin Ibrahim
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sanal K.M.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Anup T. Paul
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Temporary Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
An order of temporary injunction is passed restraining the respondents 1 and 2 from causing any obstructions to the plaint B schedule property, until the final disposal of this suit.
Evidence:
In the result, the petition is allowed as follows; (I) An order of temporary injunction is passed restraining the respondents 1 and 2 from causing any obstructions to the plaint B schedule property, until the final disposal of this suit.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
The commission report indicates that access to the plaint A schedule property of the plaintiff is only through the plaint B schedule pathway.
Reference:
IA 3/2024
Document Type: Public Notice
Submitted By: Unknown
Relevance:
The public notice issued by the defendants undermines the plaintiff's established easement rights.
Reference:

Case Classification

Case Type
Injunction
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between C.K. Mohanan vs Antony C.J et al regarding injunction for access to property
Case Code Year
Case between C.K. Mohanan vs Antony C.J et al regarding injunction for access to property

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Tue, 04/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 04/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Santharam et al vs R. Ramesh et al regarding injunction
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between V. N Ranganathan vs Sajeevan et al regarding injunction and consequential relief
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Injunction Defendant Won
Case between Jose John vs Golden Metro Apartment Owners Association et al regarding violations of association bylaws and waste collection
MUNSIFF COURT, ERNAKULAM
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between K.S. Vinod vs Dr. S. Satish Bhat et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Shyju Antony vs The Apostolic Administrator et al regarding appointments of Chancellor & Finance Officer
The Court of the Munsiff, Ernakulam
Injunction Defendant Won