Case between C.K. Mohanan vs Antony C.J et al regarding injunction for access to property

Case Summary

C.K. Mohanan, the plaintiff, filed for an injunction against defendants Antony C.J, Saju Alias Godwin, Nisha Jhon, and Suma Jhon regarding access to a public pathway leading to his property. The defendants contended that the plaintiff lacks rights to the pathway, claiming it traverses their property and asserting alternative access is available.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won

Interim Order

The court granted an injunction in favor of the plaintiff, restraining the defendants from causing obstructions to the plaintiff's access to the B schedule property. The court found that the plaintiff had established a prima facie case and the balance of convenience favored him.

Judgment Favored

Plaintiff

Relief Granted

Temporary injunction restraining the defendants from causing obstructions to the plaint B schedule property.

Case Type

Injunction

Final Judgment

No

Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff established a prima facie case for the easement right over the pathway and proved the necessity for the injunction.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the petition is allowed as follows; (I) An order of temporary injunction is passed restraining the respondents 1 and 2 from causing any obstructions to the plaint B schedule property, until the final disposal of this suit.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

C.K. Mohanan (71 years years) Chakkeriparambil House, Bharatha Rani Road, Cheranalloor P. O., Ernakulam, PIN 682034

Defendants

Antony C.J (Age not specified years) Chakyath House, Cheranellor PO Ernakulam – 682034 Saju Alias Godwin (Age not specified years) Chakyath House, Cheranellor P.O. Ernakulam – 682034 Nisha Jhon (Age not specified years) Thuruthummaparambil, Puthussery, Cheranallor P.O. Ernakulam-682034 Suma Jhon (Age not specified years) Thuruthummapararabil, Puthussery, Cheranellor P.O. Ernakulam

Reliefs

Relief Type: Temporary Injunction

Outcome: Granted

Description:

An order of temporary injunction is passed restraining the respondents 1 and 2 from causing any obstructions to the plaint B schedule property, until the final disposal of this suit.

Evidence:

In the result, the petition is allowed as follows; (I) An order of temporary injunction is passed restraining the respondents 1 and 2 from causing any obstructions to the plaint B schedule property, until the final disposal of this suit.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Commission Report

Submitted By: Court

Relevance:

The commission report indicates that access to the plaint A schedule property of the plaintiff is only through the plaint B schedule pathway.

Reference:

IA 3/2024

Document Type: Public Notice

Submitted By: Unknown