Case Summary
The case involves a petition for eviction filed by Chinnamma and her son against tenant Varghese under the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965. The court decided to stop the proceedings as the respondent did not comply with a prior order.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Possession of the petition schedule property
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court ordered the tenant Varghese to vacate the property due to non-compliance with a previous order. The petitioner's request for eviction was granted.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The respondent did not show cause for non-compliance with the previous order.
The respondent did not show cause for non-compliance with the previous order.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The respondent did not show cause for non-compliance with the previous order.
The respondent did not show cause for non-compliance with the previous order.
Supporting Evidence
No show cause is shown though sufficient time is granted.
Judgment Evidence:
Respondent/tenant is directed to put the petitioner/landlord in possession of petition schedule property under Section 12(3) of Act.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Chinnamma
- Party Age
- 83
- Relation
- W/o. Late Varghese
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sony Babu
- Party Age
- 47
- Relation
- S/o. late Varghese
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Varghese
- Party Age
- 38
- Relation
- S/o. Baby
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Jose Tom. C. Kandathil
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Mathai. K.C.
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Subabhi. K.R.
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Binu Mathew
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Krishnapriya. T.M.
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Possession
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Respondent/tenant is directed to put the petitioner/landlord in possession of petition schedule property.
Evidence:
Hence, entire proceedings in the rent control petition stopped. Respondent/tenant is directed to put the petitioner/landlord in possession of petition schedule property under Section 12(3) of Act.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between Chinnamma et al vs Varghese regarding eviction petition
Case Code Year
Case between Chinnamma et al vs Varghese regarding eviction petition