Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
R.C.P. No. 71/2023

Case between Chinnamma et al vs Varghese regarding eviction petition

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Judge
SRI. REGHUNATH N.S.
Order Date
2024-02-22
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves a petition for eviction filed by Chinnamma and her son against tenant Varghese under the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965. The court decided to stop the proceedings as the respondent did not comply with a prior order.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court ordered the tenant Varghese to vacate the property due to non-compliance with a previous order. The petitioner's request for eviction was granted.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Possession of the petition schedule property
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The respondent did not show cause for non-compliance with the previous order.

Judgment Evidence:

Respondent/tenant is directed to put the petitioner/landlord in possession of petition schedule property under Section 12(3) of Act.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Chinnamma (83 years) Kavalakkal House, Railway Station Road, Tripunithura, Nadama Village, Trippunithaura, Kanayannoor Taluk, Ernakulam District PIN – 682 301 Sony Babu (47 years) Kavalakkal House, Railway Station Road, Tripunithura, Nadama Village, Trippunithura, Kanayannoor Taluk, Ernakulam District PIN – 682 301

Defendants

Varghese (38 years) House No. II/322, Parakkal House, Vadakkekkara Post, North Paravur Taluk, Ernakulam District PIN -683 522

Reliefs

Relief Type: Possession
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Respondent/tenant is directed to put the petitioner/landlord in possession of petition schedule property.
Evidence:
Hence, entire proceedings in the rent control petition stopped. Respondent/tenant is directed to put the petitioner/landlord in possession of petition schedule property under Section 12(3) of Act.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases