Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 220 OF 2016

Case between Children et al vs Children et al regarding partition

Court
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Judge
Smt. Vincy.T.V.
Order Date
2017-06-30
Duration
Less than a year
Case Closed
Fri, 06/30/2017 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, children of deceased individuals, filed a suit for partition of property against the children of another deceased individual. The court decreed in favor of the plaintiffs and passed a preliminary decree for partition.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed in favor of the plaintiffs and passed a preliminary decree for partition of the property.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Preliminary Decree for Partition
Case Type
Partition Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed in favor of the plaintiffs and passed a preliminary decree for partition of the property.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Plaintiffs proved their case with cogent and reliable evidence, remaining unchallenged due to defendant's absence.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Plaintiffs proved their case with cogent and reliable evidence, remaining unchallenged due to defendant's absence.
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiffs's evidence remained unchallenged as defendants opted to remain exparte.

Judgment Evidence:

Marakkar is presumed to be dead and the suit is decreed. Preliminary decree for partition is passed as outlined.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Children of deceased Mavumkunnath Beerankutty Muhammadali
Party Age
68
Relation
Children of
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Children of deceased Mavumkunnath Beerankutty Haneefa
Party Age
63
Relation
Children of
Plaintiffs Documents
Partition Deed dated 23-04-1955
Defendants Documents
Not provided

Advocates

Reliefs

Relief Type: Partition
Outcome: Preliminary Decree
Description:
Partition of the plaint A schedule property into distinct shares among the plaintiffs and defendants.
Evidence:
Plaintiffs proved their entitlement to respective shares through a partition deed and cogent evidence.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Partition Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Partition deed dated 23-04-1955 supporting the plaintiffs' entitlement to specified shares.
Reference:
A1

Case Classification

Case Type
Partition Suit
Category
Family Property and Partition
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Children et al vs Children et al regarding partition
Case Code Year
Case between Children et al vs Children et al regarding partition

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Fri, 01/01/2016 - 12:00
Case Closed
Fri, 06/30/2017 - 12:00
From
Thu, 06/01/2017 - 12:00
To
Fri, 06/30/2017 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Ishaqe vs Kadiyummu Kutty et al regarding partition of property
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Partition Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Paruthikkunnan Moideenkutty vs Paruthikunnan Hassan's Children et al regarding partition
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Partition Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunhammu vs Alungal Muhammad's Children et al regarding partition
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Partition Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Thithikutty et al vs Beerankutty et al regarding partition
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Partition Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Chekkidinte Purakkal Ramlath vs Chekkidinte Purakkal Khalid's children regarding partition
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Partition Suit Defendant Won