O.S No. 547/2018

Case between Chellamma et al vs Mani V.K et al regarding restoration of a prohibitory injunction

Court

THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM

Judge

Sri. Rohit Nandakumar

Order Date

2024-07-29

Duration

approximately-6 years 2 months

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)

Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves a restoration petition by the defendants who are challenging an exparte decree passed in a prohibitory injunction suit. The defendants failed to file a written statement in the original suit despite multiple chances, leading to the decree against them.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won

Interim Order

The restoration petition was dismissed as the defendants had failed to appear and provide adequate grounds for the restoration. The court noted the defendants' negligence and lack of representation.

Judgment Favored

Defendant

Relief Granted

Case Type

Restoration Petition

Final Judgment

Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, Restoration petition stands dismissed.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Mani V.K (49 years) Vadakkedath House, Veloor Kara, Puthencruze Village, Karimukal P.O, Ernakulam- 682 303. Rajalakshmi (40 years) Vadakkedath House, Veloor Kara, Puthencruz Village, Karimukal P.O, Ernakulam- 682 303.

Defendants

Chellamma (74 years) Vadakke Morekkattu House, Thekkum Bhagom Desam and Village, Tripunithura P.O, Ernakulam District- 682 301. Jyothilakshmi (45 years) Vadakke Morekkattu House, Thekkum Bhagom Desam and Village, Tripunithura P.O, Ernakulam District- 682 301. Ashadevi (52 years) Vadakke Morekkattu House, Thekkum Bhagom Desam and Village, Tripunithura P.O, Ernakulam District- 682 301.

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other

Outcome: Refused

Description:

Petition to restore Restoration Petition No.140/2024.

Evidence:

Hence, petition is dismissed.