Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 547/2018

Case between Chellamma et al vs Mani V.K et al regarding restoration of a prohibitory injunction

Court
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2024-07-29
Duration
approximately-6 years 2 months
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves a restoration petition by the defendants who are challenging an exparte decree passed in a prohibitory injunction suit. The defendants failed to file a written statement in the original suit despite multiple chances, leading to the decree against them.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The restoration petition was dismissed as the defendants had failed to appear and provide adequate grounds for the restoration. The court noted the defendants' negligence and lack of representation.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Final Judgment
No
The restoration petition was dismissed as the defendants had failed to appear and provide adequate grounds for the restoration. The court noted the defendants' negligence and lack of representation.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, Restoration petition stands dismissed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Mani V.K
Party Age
49
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Rajalakshmi
Party Age
40
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Chellamma
Party Age
74
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Jyothilakshmi
Party Age
45
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ashadevi
Party Age
52
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Deepak Mohan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Ronald Paul
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Petition to restore Restoration Petition No.140/2024.
Evidence:
Hence, petition is dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Restoration Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Chellamma et al vs Mani V.K et al regarding restoration of a prohibitory injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Chellamma et al vs Mani V.K et al regarding restoration of a prohibitory injunction

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam District, Kerala
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Sat, 06/30/2018 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Mon, 07/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Wed, 07/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
70%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Latha Murali vs Subaida P et al regarding Restoration Petition
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Restoration Petition Defendant Won
Case between Union Bank Of India vs M/s Network Academy regarding realization of money.
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Restoration Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Vasudevan Pillai vs Muhammed Haneeffa C et al regarding restoration of a dismissed petition.
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Restoration Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Johny Thomas vs Shiju alias Thampi regarding recovery of money.
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Restoration Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Elsy James vs P.C Jose regarding restoration of original suit.
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Restoration Petition Plaintiff Won