Case Summary
Chakolas Spinning & Weaving Mills Pvt. Ltd. and others filed a petition for eviction against Pothen Vehicles & Services Pvt. Ltd. and others for non-payment of rent. The court found the respondents in default and ordered eviction.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Eviction of the tenant and possession of the property granted to the petitioner.
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court ordered the eviction of the respondents for non-compliance with rental payment orders. The tenant is directed to vacate the property in favor of the landlord.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The respondents failed to comply with the court's order to pay arrears of rent.
The respondents failed to comply with the court's order to pay arrears of rent.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The respondents failed to comply with the court's order to pay arrears of rent.
The respondents failed to comply with the court's order to pay arrears of rent.
Supporting Evidence
Counsel for petitioner submitted that respondent did not pay arrears of rent as directed in IA 04/2023.
Judgment Evidence:
Tenant/respondent is directed to put the landlord/petitioner in possession of the petition schedule property under Section 12 (3) of the Act.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Chakolas Spinning & Weaving Mills Pvt. Ltd.
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- M/s. Palu Brothers
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- John L. Chakola
- Party Age
- 63
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Ouseph L. Chakola
- Party Age
- 61
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Mathew L. Chakola
- Party Age
- 59
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Pothen Vehicles & Services Pvt. Ltd.
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Ashok Harry Pothen
- Party Age
- 60
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Pothen Autos Pvt. Ltd.
Plaintiffs Documents
No specific documents mentioned.
Defendants Documents
No specific documents mentioned.
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Rahul Kandampully
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Moly E.V.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Possession
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Tenant/respondent is directed to put the landlord/petitioner in possession of the petition schedule property under Section 12 (3) of the Act.
Evidence:
Hence, entire proceedings in the rent control petition stands closed. Tenant/respondent is directed to put the landlord/petitioner in possession of the petition schedule property under Section 12 (3) of the Act.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between Chakolas Spinning & Weaving Mills Pvt. Ltd. et al vs Pothen Vehicles & Services Pvt. Ltd. et al regarding eviction petition under the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965.
Case Code Year
Case between Chakolas Spinning & Weaving Mills Pvt. Ltd. et al vs Pothen Vehicles & Services Pvt. Ltd. et al regarding eviction petition under the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965.