Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
R.C.P. No. 154/2022

Case between Chacko Varughese alias N.C.Varughese, Christy J Varughese vs Mrs.S.VALSA regarding rent arrears

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
SMT. REEJA R. NAIR.
Order Date
2025-03-12
Duration
approximately-4 years 2 months

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The petitioners, Chacko Varughese and Christy J Varughese, are the owners of a commercial property and have filed a petition against Mrs.S.VALSA for defaulting on rent payments. The respondent has failed to pay the due rent since June 2021, resulting in significant arrears.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court ordered that the respondent must vacate the leased property and allow the petitioners to regain possession of the premises within 30 days. The petition was allowed in favor of the petitioners.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The respondent is directed to put the landlord/petitioner in possession of the petition schedule building within 30 days.
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioners provided clear evidence of unpaid rent and the respondent's failure to comply with legal notices.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, The petition is allowed u/s 11(2)(b) and 11(4)(iii) of the Act with costs...

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Chacko Varughese alias N.C.Varughese (87 years) Flat No.5A, Skyline Palmshade Apartment, Thrikkakara North Village, Kanayannur Taluk, Edappally -682 024 Christy J Varughese (57 years) Flat No. C3, Palladium Pavlon Apartment Edappally -682024

Defendants

Mrs.S.VALSA (78 years) "DEEPTHI", BTS Road Edappally Post, Edappally North Village, Ernakulam-682024

Reliefs

Relief Type: Possession
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The court directed the respondent to hand over possession of the petition schedule building to the petitioners.
Evidence:
The respondent/tenant is directed to put the landlord/petitioner in possession of the petition schedule building within 30 days from today.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The petitioners are entitled to get the costs of the petition from the respondent.
Evidence:
The petitioners are entitled to get the costs of the petition from the respondent.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Power of Attorney
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Establishes the authority of the petitioner to act on behalf of the second petitioner.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Lease Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Provides the terms of the lease agreement that was violated.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Lease Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Supports the claim related to the lease.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Lease Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Provides additional lease terms pertinent to the claim.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Lawyer's Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Details the notice sent to the respondent about the default in rent.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Acknowledgment card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Confirms receipt of the lawyer's notice.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Serves as proof of sending notices related to the case.
Reference:
Ext.A7

Quick Facts

Location
ERNAKULAM
Case Filed
Fri, 01/01/2021 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases