Case Summary
C.D. Vinu and A.K. Gangadharan were involved in a rent control petition. The matter has been settled between the parties.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Rent Control
Final Judgment
No
The rent control petition was dismissed as not pressed after the parties reached a settlement.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
The rent control petition is dismissed as not pressed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- C.D. Vinu
- Party Age
- 40
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- A.K. Gangadharan
- Party Age
- 70
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- A. Balagopalan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Rajagopalan A.
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- .N. Manmadan
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Prabhu Murali Krishnan
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Arun Valenchery
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sumson T.S.
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Rent control petition dismissed as not pressed.
Evidence:
Rent control petition is dismissed as not pressed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Rent Control
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between C.D. Vinu vs A.K. Gangadharan regarding rent control petition
Case Code Year
Case between C.D. Vinu vs A.K. Gangadharan regarding rent control petition
Case Flags
Out-of-Court Settlement