Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S No.109/2023

Case between Catapult Creative Services Pvt. Ltd. vs HITECH AYUR MEDICITY regarding realisation of money

Court
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2024-08-14
Duration
approximately-4 years 9 months

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Catapult Creative Services Pvt. Ltd., claims that the defendant, HITECH AYUR MEDICITY, owes a balance of Rs. 69,983 for items purchased on credit. The case went uncontested as the defendant did not appear, leading to a decree in favor of the plaintiff.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit is decreed in favor of the plaintiff, directing the defendant to pay Rs. 69,983 along with interest. The plaintiff is also awarded the costs of the suit.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendant directed to pay Rs. 69,983 with interest.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The case was proved based on the uncontested evidence presented by the plaintiff.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: The defendant is directed to pay to the plaintiff, an amount of Rs. 69,983 with interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of institution of the suit, till its realisation from the defendant or his assets.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Catapult Creative Services Pvt. Ltd. (Age not specified years) No. 11/674-B(3), Geo Zone, PBK Mina Road, Pin – 682 021, Vazhakkala North, Vazhakkala Village, Kanayanoor Taluk, Kochi Joison Joseph (53 years) Thachil House, Cherukadappuram Kara, North Kuthiyathode P.O, Puthenvelikkara Village, Paravur Taluk

Defendants

HITECH AYUR MEDICITY (Age not specified years) Arayidathupalam, Mavoor Road, Calicut, Pin – 673 304

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The court ordered the defendant to pay an amount of Rs.69,983/- to the plaintiff.
Evidence:
I am of the opinion that the plaintiff is entitled to recover an amount of Rs.69,983/- from the defendant.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to the costs of the suit from the defendant.
Evidence:
Considering the nature of the suit and circumstances surrounding the suit, plaintiff is entitled to the costs of the suit from the defendant.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Tax Invoice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
These documents were used to establish the sales transactions and the amount due from the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A1 series
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was likely used to notify the defendant regarding outstanding payments.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Postal Envelope
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was referenced in the context of communication with the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Ledger Account Statement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was used to show the financial relationship and outstanding balance of the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Certificate of Incorporation
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document confirmed the legal status of the plaintiff company.
Reference:
Ext.A5

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Thu, 10/10/2019 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases