Case Summary
This case involves Cargomar (Pvt) Ltd seeking to restore a previously dismissed application. The respondent, Ivor Monsurate, was set exparte.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the petition for restoration of the application that was dismissed for default, giving the petitioner another opportunity to contest.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioner has shown sufficient reason for restoration.
The petitioner has shown sufficient reason for restoration.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
It is satisfied that the petitioner has shown sufficient reason for restoration of I.A. 1/2022 in R.P 32/2022.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence, the petition is allowed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Cargomar (Pvt) Ltd
- Relation
- represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Ivor Monsurate
- Party Age
- 56
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- V M Syam Kumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Rosy P F
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sneha Rajiv
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Restoration of I.A. No. 1/2022 in R.P. No. 32 of 2022
Evidence:
Hence, the petition is allowed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Cargomar (Pvt) Ltd vs Ivor Monsurate regarding restoration of a dismissed order
Case Code Year
Case between Cargomar (Pvt) Ltd vs Ivor Monsurate regarding restoration of a dismissed order