Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ST No.39/2023

Case between C P Mathan vs N J Joseph regarding dishonor of cheque under N.I. Act

Court
COURT OF THE JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE-II PALA
Judge
Sri. Hasheem.S
Order Date
2025-08-04
Duration
approximately-5 years 3 months
Case Closed
Mon, 08/04/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

C P Mathan, the complainant, lent ₹1,00,000 to N J Joseph, the accused, who failed to repay the amount and issued a cheque that was subsequently dishonored. The court found the accused not guilty of the charge under section 138 of the N.I. Act.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The accused is found not guilty of the offence u/s 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act and is acquitted.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Criminal Case
Final Judgment
No
The accused is found not guilty of the offence u/s 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act and is acquitted.
Key Reasoning:
The defence was able to establish that the complainant's case was highly improbable and that he could not provide sufficient evidence to prove the legally enforceable debt.
Why Defendant Won:
The defence was able to establish that the complainant's case was highly improbable and that he could not provide sufficient evidence to prove the legally enforceable debt.
Supporting Evidence
The complainant failed to provide sufficient evidence to prove the consideration and execution of the cheque, dehors the presumption.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the accused is found not guilty of the offence u/s 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act. He is acquitted u/s 255(1) of Cr.P.C in respect of the said offence.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
C P Mathan
Party Age
66
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
N J Joseph
Party Age
68
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Complaint, Cheque No.68382, Legal notices, Acknowledgement of receipt.
Defendants Documents
Receipt for ₹1,27,000/-, Marriage certificate.

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.Ajith Kumar C K
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.Joseph Sebastian
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Damages
Outcome: Refused
Description:
The complainant sought to establish the debt and obtain repayment.
Evidence:
The complainant’s version that he lent ₹1,00,000/- ... is unbelievable and highly improbable.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Cheque
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The cheque was issued by the accused to the complainant to discharge a legally enforceable debt.
Reference:
Ext.P1
Document Type: Cheque Return Memo
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The cheque return memo shows the cheque was dishonoured due to insufficient funds.
Reference:
Ext.P2
Document Type: Legal Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The legal notice sent to the accused demanding repayment after the cheque was dishonoured.
Reference:
Ext.P3
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proves that the legal notice was sent to the accused.
Reference:
Ext.P4
Document Type: Postal Acknowledgment Card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Confirms that the accused received the legal notice.
Reference:
Ext.P5
Document Type: Receipt
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
A receipt that the accused used to establish a financial transaction with the complainant.
Reference:
Ext.D2
Document Type: Final Charge Report
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Final report related to another cheque case against the accused's wife.
Reference:
Ext.D3
Document Type: Marriage Certificate
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Establishes the date of the accused's daughter's marriage as a point against the complainant's assertion.
Reference:
Ext.D5
Document Type: Statement of Accounts
Submitted By: Unknown
Relevance:
Statement of accounts presented by an independent witness.
Reference:
Ext.X1

Case Classification

Case Type
Criminal Case
Category
Cheque Bounce Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Pala
Common Reasons
Cheque dishonour
Case Code
Case between C P Mathan vs N J Joseph regarding dishonor of cheque under N.I. Act
Case Code Year
Case between C P Mathan vs N J Joseph regarding dishonor of cheque under N.I. Act

Case Flags

Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque Dishonour

Quick Facts

Location
Pala
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Pala
Case Filed
Wed, 07/29/2020 - 12:00
Case Closed
Mon, 08/04/2025 - 12:00
From
Fri, 08/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 10/27/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Midhun Scaria vs George Joseph regarding Negotiable Instrument Act violation.
Court of the Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Pala
Criminal Case Plaintiff Won
Case between Balakrishnan vs Salim Thayyil regarding dishonor of cheque
COURT OF THE JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE-II PALA
Criminal Case Defendant Won
Case between Joby Jose vs Anju Prakash regarding withdrawal of complaint.
Judicial First Class Magistrate – II
Criminal Case Defendant Won
Case between Ragul K.R. vs Santha Suresh et al regarding U/s 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act.
COURT OF THE JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE - II
Criminal Case Defendant Won
Case between Mathew vs Justy Toms regarding Punishable U/s 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
IN THE COURT OF THE JUDL. Ist CLASS MAGISTRATE – II, PALA
Criminal Case Plaintiff Won