Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No. 162/2020

Case between B.Sidharthan Asan vs Sudeep. S.S et al regarding Injunction.

Court
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM.
Judge
Smt. Ragi.S.
Order Date
2025-12-02
Duration
Case Code No.
162
Case Closed
Tue, 12/02/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff B.Sidharthan Asan filed a suit for injunction against the defendants Sudeep. S.S and Siji Rani. The plaintiff was absent during the hearing, leading to the dismissal of the suit.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed for default as the plaintiff was absent and unrepresented during the hearing.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed for default as the plaintiff was absent and unrepresented during the hearing.
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiff's absence led to dismissal for default.
Why Defendant Won:
Plaintiff's absence led to dismissal for default.
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff remained absent and not ready to adduce any evidence.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, suit dismissed for default with costs of defendants.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
B.Sidharthan Asan
Party Age
70
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sudeep. S.S
Party Age
36
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Siji Rani
Party Age
36
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
V.Sugathan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
R.Geetha
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Nisha L.Prakash
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
K.C.Ushadevi
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
The plaintiff's suit for injunction was dismissed for default.
Evidence:
Hence, suit dismissed for default with costs of defendants.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Injunction
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2020

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Wed, 01/01/2020 - 12:00
Case Closed
Tue, 12/02/2025 - 12:00
From
Sat, 11/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Haridasan Potti vs Vedikkunnu Balaganapathi Kshethram regarding Injunction
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Injunction Defendant Won
Case between Sudharma et al vs Saraswathy et al regarding Injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Remya Raj vs Anupama regarding Injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Injunction Defendant Won
Case between Pious George et al vs Salavudeen et al regarding Injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Injunction Defendant Won
Case between Joseph.S et al vs Manohar Yesudas et al regarding Injunction.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Injunction Defendant Won