Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No. 882/2018

Case between Branch Manager, South Indian Bank vs Preeja, Prasannakumari regarding setting aside exparte decree.

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Judge
Smt.Ragi.S.
Order Date
2025-08-08
Duration
approximately-1 year 6 months
Case Code No.
882
Case Closed
Fri, 08/08/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves the petitioners, who are the defendants, seeking to set aside an exparte decree passed against them. They claim that they could not appear in court due to the illness of the second petitioner.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The applications IA 1/2024 and RP 121/2024 were dismissed by the court due to lack of sufficient evidence to justify the delay in filing to set aside the exparte decree.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The applications IA 1/2024 and RP 121/2024 were dismissed by the court due to lack of sufficient evidence to justify the delay in filing to set aside the exparte decree.
Key Reasoning:
The petitioners failed to provide adequate evidence to support their claim of illness that prevented them from attending the court.
Why Defendant Won:
The petitioners failed to provide adequate evidence to support their claim of illness that prevented them from attending the court.
Supporting Evidence
The delay thus remains unexplained and appears to be an attempt to protract the proceedings.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, IA 1/2024 and RP 121/2024 are dismissed. No costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Branch Manager, South Indian Bank
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Preeja
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Prasannakumari
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sandra Nelson
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
George Mathews
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Saju George
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
P.S. Varun
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Application for condonation of delay.
Evidence:
Consequently, the application for condonation of delay is devoid of merit.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Application to set aside the exparte decree.
Evidence:
In view of the findings on point No.1, this point does not germane for consideration.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2018

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Mon, 01/01/2018 - 12:00
Case Closed
Fri, 08/08/2025 - 12:00
From
Tue, 07/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Canara Bank vs St.Jude Missionary Institution et al regarding setting aside an exparte decree
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Branch Manager, Canara Bank, Kundara vs Sujitha et al regarding restoration of suit
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Branch Manager, Canara Bank vs Janasree Sangham et al regarding restoration of suit
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Branch Manager, Canara Bank vs Anaswara et al regarding restoration of suit
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Branch Manager, Canara Bank vs Stanly John et al regarding restoration of EP.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won