Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S 282/2019

Case between Binu P.K. vs Bindhu Sajan et al regarding dismissal of the suit

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Judge
Smitha Susan Mathew
Order Date
2025-02-25
Duration
Case Code No.
282
Case Closed
Tue, 02/25/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Binu P.K. is the plaintiff, and Bindhu Sajan, Rani V.K., Pramod, and Aji P.C. are the defendants. The case was dismissed due to the non-appearance of the plaintiff after receiving a notice from the court.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit due to the plaintiff's lack of interest and non-appearance after receiving a notice.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit due to the plaintiff's lack of interest and non-appearance after receiving a notice.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff did not appear in court after being notified.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff did not appear in court after being notified.
Supporting Evidence
As no instructions from plaintiff was submitted by the learned counsel, a notice was issued from the office to plaintiff for his appearance.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence the suit is dismissed for the non-corporation of the plaintiff.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Binu P.K.
Party Age
38
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Bindhu Sajan
Party Age
41
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Rani V.K.
Party Age
32
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Pramod
Party Age
35
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Aji P.C.
Party Age
42
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
K.A George
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Muhammed Haris K.S.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
T.S. Rajeswaran
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
George Kurian
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The suit is dismissed for the non-corporation of the plaintiff.
Evidence:
Hence the suit is dismissed for the non-corporation of the plaintiff.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kanjirappally
Common Reasons
Case Code
O.S
Case Code Year
2019

Quick Facts

Location
Kanjirappally
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kanjirappally
Case Filed
Tue, 01/01/2019 - 12:00
Case Closed
Tue, 02/25/2025 - 12:00
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 02/28/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Abraham Mathew et al vs Suresh Raman et al regarding suit dismissal
Court of the Munsiff, Kanjirappally
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Union Bank of India vs Dhanya S., Silamban M. et al regarding non-payment of court fee.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Anilkumar vs Chirakkadavu Grama Panchayath regarding withdrawal of suit.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Joseph Antony et al vs C. M. M Educational and Charitable Trust regarding Interlocutory Application
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Anilkumar vs Chirakkadavu Grama Panchayat regarding withdrawal of suit.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won