Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
R.C.P. No. 130/2021

Case between Binu Krishnan vs Mulanthuruthy Grama Panchayath regarding eviction

Court
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
SRI. REGHUNATH N.S.
Order Date
2024-02-02
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Binu Krishnan filed a petition for eviction under the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965 against Mulanthuruthy Grama Panchayath. The petitioner was absent during the hearing, leading to the dismissal of the petition.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The petition was dismissed for default due to the absence of the petitioner.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The petition was dismissed for default due to the absence of the petitioner.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, petition is dismissed for default with costs to respondent.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Binu Krishnan
Party Age
50
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mulanthuruthy Grama Panchayath
Relation
Represented by
Plaintiffs Documents
Stamp on Rent Control Petition, Stamp on Vakalath, Stamp on petition, Stamp on Documents
Defendants Documents
Stamp on vakalath

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
P.T. Johnson
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Jeemon P. Abraham
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sakhi Gopalan
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
V.A. Johnson
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Eldho Cherian
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Hari Krishnan
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Cyaric Tom
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Naveen K. Varkey
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Hari P. Nair
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Eviction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Petition for eviction filed under Section 11(4)(IV) Proviso (3) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965.
Evidence:
Hence, petition is dismissed for default with costs to respondent.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Binu Krishnan vs Mulanthuruthy Grama Panchayath regarding eviction
Case Code Year
Case between Binu Krishnan vs Mulanthuruthy Grama Panchayath regarding eviction

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Thu, 02/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Thu, 02/29/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Panchayat

Similar Cases

Case between Anil K.M. vs Mulanthuruthy Grama Panchayath regarding eviction
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Rent Control Petition Defendant Won
Case between N.X. Joseph Jason vs Noble George regarding eviction and rent fixation
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Lalithamma Radhakrishna Menon vs Cheranellor Grama Panchayath regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Dr. M.N Subramanian et al vs M/s Jigucheon Pvt Ltd et al regarding Rent Control Petition
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Hameed et al vs Shamsudheen et al regarding Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control)Act, 1965
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Rent Control Petition Unknown