Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
OS. No. 37 / 2023

Case between Bindu Pathrose vs The South Indian Bank Ltd. et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.

Court
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF KOLENCHERY
Judge
Smt. Sirsha.N.A
Order Date
2024-01-31
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The petitioner, Bindu Pathrose, is seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against The South Indian Bank Ltd. and its Authorized Officer to prevent eviction from her agricultural property. The bank claims it is taking legal steps for loan recovery, which the petitioner contests.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The application for a temporary injunction filed by Bindu Pathrose was dismissed, as the court found that the petitioner failed to establish a prima facie case.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The petitioner did not substantiate claims of being deprived of any legal rights regarding the property.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result: This application is dismissed.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Bindu Pathrose (50 years) Vattappara House, Vembily, Airkkaranadu, Ernakulam-683 565

Defendants

The South Indian Bank Ltd. (Age not specified years) Morakkala Branch, Opposite St. Mary's Cathredal, Morakkala, Kumarapuram, Ernakulam District - 683565 The Authorized Officer, The South Indian Bank Ltd. (Age not specified years) SIB Building, Infopark Road, Rajagiri Valley P.O, Kakkanadu, Pin 682039

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Refused
Description:
The petitioner / plaintiff sought a temporary injunction restraining the respondent / defendant bank from causing any obstruction to the peaceful residence in the house situated at plaint schedule property which is an agricultural property.
Evidence:
Here, the petitioner / plaintiff has sought for a temporary injunction restraining the respondent / defendant bank from causing any obstruction to the peaceful residence in the house situated at plaint schedule property which is an agricultural property.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases