Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
S.T. No:164/2017

Case between Bindu Joshi vs Antony Joseph regarding offence under N.I. Act

Court
COURT OF JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE -II, TIRUR
Judge
Sri. Jankish Narayanan
Order Date
2019-08-19
Duration
1 year 9 months

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves a complaint by Bindu Joshi against Antony Joseph for an alleged offence under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The complainant was absent multiple times during the proceedings, leading to the dismissal of the complaint.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The complaint was dismissed due to the complainant's continuous absence without reasonable cause, indicating a lack of vigilance in pursuing the case.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Criminal Case
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The complainant failed to appear and provide evidence after multiple opportunities were given by the court.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the complaint is dismissed under S. 256 (1) Criminal Procedure Code.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Bindu Joshi (Age not specified years) Poovathotathil House, P.O Kuttipuram, Tirur Taluk, Pin 679 571

Defendants

Antony Joseph (Age not specified years) Kannampuzha House, Vattiyamthodu. P.O, Ulikkal Via, Kannur 670 705

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Complaint is dismissed due to continuous absence of the complainant.
Evidence:
In the result, the complaint is dismissed under S. 256 (1) Criminal Procedure Code.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases