Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
S.T. No:164/2017

Case between Bindu Joshi vs Antony Joseph regarding offence under N.I. Act

Court
COURT OF JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE -II, TIRUR
Judge
Sri. Jankish Narayanan
Order Date
2019-08-19
Duration
1 year 9 months
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves a complaint by Bindu Joshi against Antony Joseph for an alleged offence under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The complainant was absent multiple times during the proceedings, leading to the dismissal of the complaint.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The complaint was dismissed due to the complainant's continuous absence without reasonable cause, indicating a lack of vigilance in pursuing the case.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Criminal Case
Final Judgment
No
The complaint was dismissed due to the complainant's continuous absence without reasonable cause, indicating a lack of vigilance in pursuing the case.
Key Reasoning:
The complainant failed to appear and provide evidence after multiple opportunities were given by the court.
Why Defendant Won:
The complainant failed to appear and provide evidence after multiple opportunities were given by the court.
Supporting Evidence
I am satisfied that the complainant is not vigilant in pursuing the matter.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the complaint is dismissed under S. 256 (1) Criminal Procedure Code.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Bindu Joshi
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Antony Joseph
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Mujeeb Rahiman. V
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Smt. B.K Bindu
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Complaint is dismissed due to continuous absence of the complainant.
Evidence:
In the result, the complaint is dismissed under S. 256 (1) Criminal Procedure Code.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Criminal Case
Category
Cheque Bounce Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between Bindu Joshi vs Antony Joseph regarding offence under N.I. Act
Case Code Year
Case between Bindu Joshi vs Antony Joseph regarding offence under N.I. Act

Case Flags

Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque Dishonour

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Thu, 08/01/2019 - 12:00
To
Sat, 08/31/2019 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Sree Gokulam Chit & Finance Co-Pvt.Ltd vs Haneefa. M regarding offence under N.I. Act.
COURT OF JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE -II, TIRUR
Criminal Case Defendant Won
Case between Kottepadam Chits Pvt.Ltd. vs Rajani regarding offence under N.I. Act.
COURT OF JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE -II, TIRUR
Criminal Case Defendant Won
Case between Chandran vs Sasikala et al regarding cheque dishonour under Negotiable Instruments Act
COURT OF JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE -11
Criminal Case Defendant Won
Case between Mohammed Musthafa vs Nazar Poozhikunnath regarding cheque dishonor
COURT OF JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE -11
Criminal Case Defendant Won
Case between Mohammed Rafi vs Mohammed Shereef regarding U/s 138 of N.I. Act
JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE-II
Criminal Case Plaintiff Won