Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
R.C.P. No. 83/2023

Case between Basheer T.A. vs Abdul Salam M.C regarding eviction under the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act.

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
SRI. REGHUNATH N.S.
Order Date
2024-04-08
Duration
approximately-1 year 11 months

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The petitioner, Basheer T.A., seeks eviction of the respondent, Abdul Salam M.C., for default in rent payment and unlawful subletting of the property. The case involves allegations of breach of the rent agreement and a claim for possession of the property.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court ordered that the respondent must give possession of the property to the petitioner within 30 days. Additionally, costs of the petition are to be borne by the respondent.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Order for possession of the petition schedule building.
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioner proved his case by showing that the respondent defaulted in payment and sublet the property in violation of the terms of the rent agreement.

Judgment Evidence:

The petition is allowed. 1. The respondent is directed to put the landlord in possession of the petition schedule building under Section 11(2)(b) of the Act within 30 days from today.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Basheer T.A. (52 years) Tharupeedikayil House, Madavana, Eriyad, Kodungallur - 680666

Defendants

Abdul Salam M.C (45 years) Guddakari House, 15/317, Hosabetti, Manjeswar, Hosabettu Kasaragod 671323

Reliefs

Relief Type: Eviction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The respondent is directed to put the landlord in possession of the property.
Evidence:
The petition is allowed. The respondent is directed to put the landlord in possession of the petition schedule building under Section 11(2)(b) of the Act within 30 days from today.
Relief Type: Eviction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The respondent is directed to put the landlord in possession of the property.
Evidence:
The respondent is directed to put the landlord in possession of the petition schedule building under Section 11(3) of the Act within 30 days from today.
Relief Type: Eviction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The respondent is directed to put the landlord in possession of the property.
Evidence:
The respondent is directed to put the landlord in possession of the petition schedule building under Section 11(4)(i) of the Act within 30 days from today.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The petitioner is entitled to get the costs of the petition from the 1st respondent.
Evidence:
The petitioner is entitled to get the costs of the petition from the 1st respondent.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Power of Attorney
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The power of attorney holder represented the petitioner in the case.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Certified copy of the Sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Provided evidence of the petitioner's title to the property.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Property Tax Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Demonstrated the petitioner's claim regarding the property.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Land Tax Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Supported the ownership claims of the petitioner.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Rent Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Essential for establishing the terms under which the property was rented.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Certified copy of the Private Complaint
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Relevant to establish the background of the dispute.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Certified copy of the FIR
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Provided evidence regarding the legal issues surrounding the respondents.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Certified copy of the Complaint
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Relevant to show ongoing legal actions involving the respondents.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Certified copy of the FIR
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Provided additional evidence regarding the legal issues with the respondents.
Reference:
Ext.A9
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Indicated the petitioner's formal demand for possession of the property.
Reference:
Ext.A10
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proof of service for the lawyer notice sent to the respondent.
Reference:
Ext.A11
Document Type: Unclaimed postal cover
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Demonstrated that the respondent did not receive the notice.
Reference:
Ext.A12
Document Type: Commissioner Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Provided evidence of the condition and status of the property in question.
Reference:
Ext.C1
Document Type: Photograph
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Visual evidence supporting the commissioner report regarding the property.
Reference:
Ext.C1(a)

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Mon, 05/01/2023 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases