Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 1320 /2022

Case between Bank of Baroda vs Soumya regarding realization of money.

Court
II Additional Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Judge
Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany
Order Date
2024-08-27
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Bank of Baroda, is seeking to recover money from the defendant, Soumya. The matter has been settled in mediation, with the defendant agreeing to pay the amount as per the mediation agreement.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit is decreed in terms of the mediation agreement, indicating that the defendant has paid the agreed amount. The mediation agreement is accepted and recorded by the court.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Decree in terms of mediation agreement.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit is decreed in terms of the mediation agreement, indicating that the defendant has paid the agreed amount. The mediation agreement is accepted and recorded by the court.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Supporting Evidence
As per the mediation agreement, defendant has paid the agreed amount. The terms of mediation agreement are found to be lawful and hence accepted.

Judgment Evidence:

The suit is decreed in terms of mediation agreement.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Bank of Baroda
Relation
represented by its Senior Manager
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Soumya
Party Age
34
Relation
W/o Manoj
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Santhosh.G.Prabhu
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Deepa.N.U
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Aswathy.A.
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
V. Dipu
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
O Sajeevan
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sooraj.T.S
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Suit is decreed in terms of mediation agreement.
Evidence:
Suit is decreed in terms of mediation agreement.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between Bank of Baroda vs Soumya regarding realization of money.
Case Code Year
Case between Bank of Baroda vs Soumya regarding realization of money.

Case Flags

Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Thu, 08/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Sat, 08/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Nadamel Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd. et al vs Sheeba Thambi regarding recovery of money
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between M/s HDFC Bank Ltd vs Syju M Thankachan regarding suit for money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Union Bank of India vs Mettilda Ammu et al regarding money loan repayment
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Dhanlaxmi Bank Ltd. et al vs Franson Silver Rock, Laly Francis regarding realization of money
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s. Kerala Gramin Bank vs Sophy K. M. et al regarding realisation of money
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won