Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
S.T. No:120/2017

Case between Baiju. P.K vs Rajan regarding dishonor of cheque

Court
COURT OF JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE -II
Judge
Sri. Jankish Narayanan
Order Date
2019-09-23
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This case involves a complaint filed by Baiju against Rajan for issuing a cheque that was returned due to insufficient funds. Baiju claims that the cheque was issued to discharge a liability towards him.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court found the accused guilty of the offence under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and imposed a sentence of imprisonment and compensation.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Compensation of Rs.1,50,000/-
Case Type
Criminal Case
Final Judgment
No
The court found the accused guilty of the offence under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and imposed a sentence of imprisonment and compensation.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The complainant proved that the cheque was issued for a legally enforceable debt.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The complainant proved that the cheque was issued for a legally enforceable debt.
Supporting Evidence
The oral evidence of PW1, coupled with Exbt.P2 memorandum would prove that the complainant had presented Exbt. P1 cheque for encashment and the cheque was returned by the bank for the reason 'Insufficient Funds'.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the accused is sentenced to suffer imprisonment till the raising of the Court and to pay compensation of Rs.150,000/- (Rupees One Lakh and Fifty Thousand only) under section 357(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure for the offence punishable under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Baiju. P.K
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Rajan
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Cheque No.486043, dated 17.07.2015, Memo issued by South Malabar Gramin Bank, Lawyer notice, Postal Receipt, Acknowledgment card
Defendants Documents
Lawyer Notice

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. P.P. Mohandas
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.J. Dhaneesh
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The accused is directed to pay compensation to the complainant.
Evidence:
The accused is found guilty and convicted for an offence punishable u/s 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act and sentenced to undergo imprisonment till the raising of the court and is directed to pay compensation of Rs.1,50,000/- (Rupees One Lakh and Fifty Thousand only) to the complainant u/s 357 (3) of Cr.P.C.
Relief Type: Imprisonment
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The accused is sentenced to simple imprisonment for non-payment of compensation.
Evidence:
In default of payment of compensation, the accused shall undergo simple imprisonment for a period of 3 months.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Cheque
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Cheque issued by the accused to the complainant to discharge a liability.
Reference:
Ext.P1
Document Type: Memorandum
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Memorandum from the bank indicating the cheque was returned unpaid due to insufficient funds.
Reference:
Ext.P2
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Notice issued to the accused informing them of the dishonor of the cheque and demanding payment.
Reference:
Ext.P3
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Postal receipt confirming the sending of the lawyer notice to the accused.
Reference:
Ext.P3(a)
Document Type: Acknowledgment card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Acknowledgment card evidencing the service of the statutory notice on the accused.
Reference:
Ext.P4
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Notice from the defendant disputing the claims made by the complainant.
Reference:
Exbt. D1

Case Classification

Case Type
Criminal Case
Category
Cheque Bounce Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Cheque dishonour
Case Code
Case between Baiju. P.K vs Rajan regarding dishonor of cheque
Case Code Year
Case between Baiju. P.K vs Rajan regarding dishonor of cheque

Case Flags

Cheque-Related Case
Imprisonment Involved
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque dishonour under Section 138 N.I. Act
Imprisonment Duration
3 months

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sun, 09/01/2019 - 12:00
To
Mon, 09/30/2019 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Sree Gokulam Chit & Finance Co-Pvt.Ltd vs Haneefa. M regarding offence under N.I. Act.
COURT OF JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE -II, TIRUR
Criminal Case Defendant Won
Case between Mohammed Musthafa vs Nazar Poozhikunnath regarding cheque dishonor
COURT OF JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE -11
Criminal Case Defendant Won
Case between Shaijal Babu vs Abdul Razak. T.K regarding U/s 138 of N.I. Act
Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Tirur
Criminal Case Unknown
Case between M. Abdulkhader Haji vs Muhammed Abdul Noor regarding offence under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act
Court of Judicial First Class Magistrate -II, Tirur
Criminal Case Plaintiff Won
Case between Mohammed Rafi vs Mohammed Shereef regarding U/s 138 of N.I. Act
JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE-II
Criminal Case Plaintiff Won