Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No. 1019/2023

Case between Associated Rubber Chemicals (Kochi) Pvt. Ltd. vs M/s. Plumbers Choice Plastic Pvt. Ltd. et al regarding realisation of money.

Court
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2024-07-06
Duration
approximately-1 year 11 days

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Associated Rubber Chemicals (Kochi) Pvt. Ltd. is suing M/s. Plumbers Choice Plastic Pvt. Ltd. and its Managing Director, M. H Hinsaf, for money owed pertaining to a commercial transaction. The defendants did not appear in court, leading to the suit being considered ex parte.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court found in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendants to pay ₹4,87,452/- along with interest at 6% per annum from the date of the suit. The suit was decreed due to the defendants' failure to appear.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendants are directed to pay ₹4,87,452/- with interest.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff's case was proven through the evidence presented by their Deputy General Manager.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: The defendants are directed to pay to the plaintiff, an amount of 4,87,452/- (Rupees four lakhs eighty seven thousand four hundred and fifty two only) with interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of institution of the suit, till its realisation from the defendants and their assets.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Associated Rubber Chemicals (Kochi) Pvt. Ltd. (Age not specified years) 34/1397-A, Assochem Chambers, NH – 47, Bypass, Edappally North Village, Kanayanoor Taluk, Ernakulam, Cochin – 682 024, Kerala

Defendants

M/s. Plumbers Choice Plastic Pvt. Ltd. (Age not specified years) Meparathupady, Arackpadi P. O, Vengola, Perumbavoor, Ernakulam, Pin – 683 556 M. H Hinsaf (55 years) New Sheriland, Poorna Nagar, Ernakulam, Aluva, Pin – 683 101

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The defendants are directed to pay the plaintiff an amount of 4,87,452/- with interest.
Evidence:
In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: I. The defendants are directed to pay to the plaintiff, an amount of 4,87,452/- with interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of institution of the suit, till its realisation from the defendants and their assets.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to the costs of the suit from the defendants.
Evidence:
Considering the nature of the suit and circumstances surrounding the suit, the plaintiff is entitled to the costs of the suit from the defendants.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Office copy of Tax Invoice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was used to establish the amount owed by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Office copy of Tax Invoice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was used to establish the amount owed by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Office copy of Tax Invoice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was used to establish the amount owed by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Office copy of Tax Invoice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was used to establish the amount owed by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Office copy of Tax Invoice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was used to establish the amount owed by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Office copy of Tax Invoice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was used to establish the amount owed by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Office copy of Tax Invoice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was used to establish the amount owed by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Office copy of Tax Invoice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was used to establish the amount owed by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A9
Document Type: True copy of the lawyer notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was used to establish that the plaintiff had taken steps to notify the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A10
Document Type: Postal Acknowledgment Card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was used to establish the receipt of the notice by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A11
Document Type: Oral Evidence
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Oral evidence was given by the Deputy General Manager of the plaintiff company.
Reference:

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam, Kerala
Case Filed
Thu, 07/06/2023 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases