Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 425/2024

Case between Ashwin A.S vs Anil Kumar et al regarding realization of money

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
SMT. REEJA R. NAIR.
Order Date
2025-04-11
Duration
approximately-2 years 10 months
Case Closed
Fri, 04/11/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Ashwin A.S, is seeking recovery of Rs.3,50,000 from the first defendant, Anil Kumar, who allegedly promised him a job abroad but failed to deliver. The case involves claims of fraud and the plaintiff seeks financial compensation.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court found in favor of the plaintiff, Ashwin A.S, allowing him to recover Rs.3,50,000 from the first defendant, Anil Kumar. Interest and costs of the suit were also awarded to the plaintiff.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of Rs.3,50,000 and interest for the amount from the first defendant.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court found in favor of the plaintiff, Ashwin A.S, allowing him to recover Rs.3,50,000 from the first defendant, Anil Kumar. Interest and costs of the suit were also awarded to the plaintiff.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The unrebutted oral testimony of the plaintiff and the submitted documents established the claim.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The unrebutted oral testimony of PW1 and Exts. A1 to A4 established the case as pleaded by the plaintiff. In the absence of any countervailing evidence to contradict this proof of plaint claim, I learn that same remains uncontroverted and accordingly admitted.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is decreed as follows; 1. The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of Rs.3,50,000/- (Rupees Three Lakh Fifty Thousand only) from the 1st defendant and from his assets.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Ashwin A.S
Party Age
29
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Anil Kumar
Party Age
50
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sagil A.K
Party Age
33
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Saint Lucia Academy
Plaintiffs Documents
Original receipt dated 21.06.2023, Original bank receipt dated 15.09.2022, Original memorandum of understanding executed by 1st defendant dated 15.09.2022, Printout of FIR in Crime No. 303/2023.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Aneesh K.R.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Lia George
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Saurav B.
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Deepika P.
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
K. Mohammed Rafeeq
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of Rs.3,50,000/- from the 1st defendant and from his assets.
Evidence:
In the result, suit is decreed as follows; 1.The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of Rs.3,50,000/- (Rupees Three Lakh Fifty Thousand only) from the 1st defendant and from his assets.
Relief Type: Damages
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to realize interest @ 12% per annum for Rs.3,50,000/- from the date of suit till date decree from the 1st defendant and from his assets.
Evidence:
2.The plaintiff is entitled to realize interest @ 12% per annum for Rs.3,50,000/- (Rupees Three Lakh Fifty Thousand only) from the date of suit till date decree from the 1st defendant and from his assets.
Relief Type: Damages
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to realize interest @ 6% per annum for Rs.3,50,000/- from date of decree till date of realization from the 1st defendant and from his assets.
Evidence:
3.The plaintiff is entitled to realize interest @ 6% per annum for Rs.3,50,000/- (Rupees Three Lakh Fifty Thousand only) from date of decree till date of realization from the 1st defendant and from his assets.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to realize costs of the suit from the 1st defendant and from his assets.
Evidence:
4.The plaintiff is entitled to realize costs of the suit from 1st defendant and from his assets.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Original Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Acknowledges payment of Rs.50,000/- to the 1st defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Original bank receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Shows deposit of Rs. 3,00,000/- to the 1st defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Original memorandum of understanding
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Executed by the 1st defendant after receipt of Rs.3,50,000/- from the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Printout of FIR
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Documents the criminal case against the 1st defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A4

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between Ashwin A.S vs Anil Kumar et al regarding realization of money
Case Code Year
Case between Ashwin A.S vs Anil Kumar et al regarding realization of money

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Fri, 06/21/2024 - 12:00
Case Closed
Fri, 04/11/2025 - 12:00
From
Tue, 04/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 04/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Canara Bank vs Mrs. Preethymol P.T regarding realization of money
Court of the Third Addl. Munsiff & Rent Controller, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Fr. Antony Chiriyankandath vs Sri. Mathew C.T. regarding realization of money
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Bank of Baroda represented by its Chief Manager, Manohar M vs Ratheesh P.S regarding recovery of money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Meera N B vs Vincy E J et al regarding realization of money
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s Transformers and Electrical Industries vs M/s Crystal Traders regarding realization of money
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won