Case Summary
Arimanichola Iyyachakkutty filed a restoration petition, which was allowed after payment of Rs 2000.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Restoration of application
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Final Judgment
No
The restoration petition filed by Arimanichola Iyyachakkutty was allowed on payment of Rs 2000.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Not available
Judgment Evidence:
Restoration application allowed on payment of Rs 2000/-.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Arimanichola Iyyachakkutty
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Ayinikkal Ibrahim
Plaintiffs Documents
Counter filed, Restoration application
Defendants Documents
Counter filed, Payment of Rs 2000
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- K. Vipin
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Advocate for Ayinikkal Ibrahim
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Restoration of application
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Allow restoration of application on payment of Rs 2000
Evidence:
Restoration application allowed on payment of Rs 2000/-.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Category
Case Restoration and Delays
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Arimanichola Iyyachakkutty vs Ayinikkal Ibrahim regarding Restoration Petition
Case Code Year
Case between Arimanichola Iyyachakkutty vs Ayinikkal Ibrahim regarding Restoration Petition