Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No.391 /2012

Case between Aravindakshan Nair et al vs Kuriakose et al regarding mediation agreement

Court
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi. K. Dinamany.
Order Date
2024-12-21
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, Aravindakshan Nair and others, filed a suit against the defendants, Kuriakose and Achamma, which has been settled through mediation. The terms of the mediation agreement were found to be lawful.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit as per the terms of the mediation settlement, which were found lawful.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Refund of court fee as per law.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit as per the terms of the mediation settlement, which were found lawful.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The terms of the mediation agreement were found to be lawful.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The terms of the mediation agreement were found to be lawful.
Supporting Evidence
Terms of mediation agreement is found to be lawful.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence suit is decreed as per terms of mediation.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Aravindakshan Nair
Party Age
73
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Radhamma
Party Age
63
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Jayakumar
Party Age
39
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Ravikumar
Party Age
38
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Kuriakose
Party Age
60
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Achamma
Party Age
55
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Alias M Cherian
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
P A Augustine
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
P T Sebastian
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
K M Subair
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Suit is decreed as per terms of mediation.
Evidence:
Hence suit is decreed as per terms of mediation.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Settlement and Mediation
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Aravindakshan Nair et al vs Kuriakose et al regarding mediation agreement
Case Code Year
Case between Aravindakshan Nair et al vs Kuriakose et al regarding mediation agreement

Case Flags

Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam District
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sun, 12/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Tue, 12/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Midulal vs Rajesh regarding mediation settlement
II ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Union Bank of India vs Satheesh Kumar V. M et al regarding mediation settlement
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Union Bank of India vs Sarun.M.A et al regarding mediation settlement
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Bank of Baroda vs Wilson Xavier regarding mediation settlement
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Mr. V.A. Antony vs The Thykoodam Edavaka Christeeya Sangam regarding suit for declaration, injunction
THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown