Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No. 394 /2022

Case between Aravind Kumar vs Saju M Y regarding realization of money

Court
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany.
Order Date
2025-03-10
Duration
approximately-3 years 10 days

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Aravind Kumar, is suing the defendant, Saju M Y, for the repayment of a loan amounting to Rs. 6,00,000/- that was allegedly given to the defendant for his daughter's education. The defendant denies this claim, asserting that the money was paid on behalf of another party.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit filed by the plaintiff for realization of money, concluding that the plaintiff failed to prove his claims regarding the loan.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff failed to establish that the money was given as a loan.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is dismissed with costs.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Aravind Kumar (73 years) C C 61/689, M G Road, Ravipuram, Kochi- 682016

Defendants

Saju M Y (Age not specified years) Maliekal House, Thiruvaniyoor Village, Kokkappilly P O, Ernakulam District, Pin- 682305

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Refused
Description:
The plaintiff requested recovery of a loan amount of Rs. 7,80,000/-.
Evidence:
Accordingly, I have no hesitation to hold that plaintiff is not entitled for any amounts from defendant.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The defendant is entitled to get the costs of the proceedings.
Evidence:
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, defendant is entitled to get the costs of the proceedings.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The plaintiff sent this notice seeking repayment of the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Reply Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The defendant responded to the plaintiff's lawyer notice with this document.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Bank statement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This statement was produced to substantiate the claim.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Bank statement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This statement was produced to support the plaintiff's claims.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Certified copy of Plaint
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
This document supports the defendant's case regarding the context of the loan.
Reference:
Ext.B1
Document Type: Certified copy of Plaint
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
This document is part of the evidence presented by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.B2
Document Type: Judgment
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
This judgment supports the defendant's assertions.
Reference:
Ext.B3
Document Type: Certified copy of Sale Deed
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
This deed is relevant to the property transaction involving Rajan.
Reference:
Ext.B4
Document Type: Certified copy of Sale Deed
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Another deed related to the property involved.
Reference:
Ext.B5
Document Type: Certified copy of written statement
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
This written statement contributes to the defendant's narrative.
Reference:
Ext.B7
Document Type: Certified Copy of Criminal Case
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
This document provides context about the defendant's legal circumstances.
Reference:
Ext.B8
Document Type: Bank Account statement
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
This statement is relevant to the financial transactions at issue.
Reference:
Ext.B9
Document Type: Call Details and Certificate
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
This certificate provides evidence related to communication between parties.
Reference:
Ext.B10

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Mon, 02/07/2022 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases