Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S 205/2020

Case between Antony K.J. vs Jayaprakash A.R. et al regarding declaration of possession and fixation of boundary.

Court
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Judge
Smitha Susan Mathew
Order Date
2025-06-30
Duration
approximately-5 years 28 days
Case Code No.
205
Case Closed
Mon, 06/30/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Antony K.J. filed a suit against Jayaprakash A.R. and Valsamma Jayaprakash for a declaration of possessory rights over a property. The case involves disputes over property boundaries and claims of ownership.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, declaring his possessory rights over the property and fixing the northern boundary as requested.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Declaration of possessory right, fixation of boundary, and a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, declaring his possessory rights over the property and fixing the northern boundary as requested.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff demonstrated possession and the defendants failed to prove their claim to the property.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff demonstrated possession and the defendants failed to prove their claim to the property.
Supporting Evidence
As per the records available before the Court, the plaintiff is in possession of plaint schedule item No.1 property. The defendants have no right over item No.1 property.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result the suit is decreed as follows: 1. A decree is granted declaring the possessory right of plaintiff over plaint schedule item No.1 property. 2. The Northern boundary of the plaint schedule Item No.1 property is fixed through 'MN' line as plotted in Ext.C1(a) plan.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Antony K.J.
Party Age
60
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Jayaprakash A.R.
Party Age
65
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Valsamma Jayaprakash @ Valsa
Party Age
61
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Certified copy of sale deed No. 2972/1970, Certified copy of partition deed No. 1258/1962, Certified copy of partition deed No. 1449/1992.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Alex J Edackattu
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Aloysius John Madathinakam
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
K.S. Sajikumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Declaration
Outcome: Granted
Description:
A decree is granted declaring the possessory right of plaintiff over plaint schedule item No.1 property.
Evidence:
A decree is granted declaring the possessory right of plaintiff over plaint schedule item No.1 property.
Relief Type: Boundary Fixation
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The Northern boundary of the plaint schedule Item No.1 property is fixed through ‘MN’ line as plotted in Ext.C1(a) plan.
Evidence:
The Northern boundary of the plaint schedule Item No.1 property is fixed through ‘MN’ line as plotted in Ext.C1(a) plan.
Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
A decree of permanent prohibitory injunction is granted restraining the defendants from trespassing on the plaint schedule item No.1 property.
Evidence:
A decree of permanent prohibitory injunction is granted restraining the defendants from trespassing on the plaint schedule item No.1 property.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of the sale deed to establish ownership of the property.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Partition Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of the prior partition deed that relates to the property.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Partition Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of the partition deed establishing ownership.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Commission report indicating boundaries and condition of the property.
Reference:
Ext.C1
Document Type: Survey Plan
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Survey plan prepared to delineate the boundary between the properties.
Reference:
Ext.C1(a)

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Property and Possession Disputes
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kanjirappally
Common Reasons
Case Code
O.S
Case Code Year
2020

Quick Facts

Location
Kanjirappally
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kanjirappally
Case Filed
Tue, 06/02/2020 - 12:00
Case Closed
Mon, 06/30/2025 - 12:00
From
Thu, 05/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 06/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between John Joseph vs John Daniyel et al regarding partition of property
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Naseema et al vs Muhammed Ismail regarding partition of property.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between K.E.Shaji et al vs P. Pathumuthu et al regarding partition of property.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between K.E.Shaji et al vs P. Pathumuthu et al regarding partition of property.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Naseema et al vs Muhammed Ismail regarding partition of property
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won