Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
R.C.P. No. 65/2023

Case between Anthiyalunkal Deepa Mathai vs Sarath Prakash regarding arrears of rent

Court
THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
SMT. REEJA R. NAIR.
Order Date
2024-07-31
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The petitioner, Anthiyalunkal Deepa Mathai, is seeking to regain possession of her property due to non-payment of rent by the respondent, Sarath Prakash. The respondent defaulted on monthly rent payments and has not vacated the premises as requested.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The petition was allowed, directing the respondent to vacate the premises within 30 days. The court found the petitioner entitled to the relief sought due to the respondent's failure to pay rent.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The respondent is directed to put the landlord in possession of the petition schedule building after removing all articles.
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioner established her case with unrebutted evidence.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, The petition is allowed u/s 11(2)(b) of the Act with costs as follows: 1. The respondent/tenant is directed to put the landlord/petitioner in possession of the petition schedule building after removing all the articles from the petition schedule building under Section 11(2)(b) of the Act within 30 days from today.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Anthiyalunkal Deepa Mathai (49 years years) Kallarackal House, Mamalassery Kara, Mamalassery P.O., Ramamangalam Village, Kunnathunadu Taluk, Ernakulam District­686663

Defendants

Sarath Prakash (27 years years) Ambalathinkal House, Pathar, Malappuram District, Pin­679334

Reliefs

Relief Type: Possession
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The respondent is directed to put the landlord/petitioner in possession of the petition schedule building.
Evidence:
The petition is allowed u/s 11(2)(b) of the Act with costs as follows: The respondent/tenant is directed to put the landlord/petitioner in possession of the petition schedule building after removing all the articles from the petition schedule building under Section 11(2)(b) of the Act within 30 days from today.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Lawyer's Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of the lawyer's notice sent to the respondent regarding arrears of rent.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Postal Acknowledgment Card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original postal acknowledgment card sent to the respondent.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Lawyer's Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of the lawyer's notice sent to the respondent regarding rent due.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Returned Postal Article
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original returned postal article sent to the respondent.
Reference:
Ext.A4

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Mon, 08/01/2022 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases