Case Summary
Aniyamma Thomas is the plaintiff seeking an ad interim injunction against the defendants Thomas and Jomon Thomas. The case involves a dispute over the plaint schedule property.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Ad interim injunction granted.
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The court granted an ad interim injunction preventing the defendants from altering the property specified in the plaint.
Why Plaintiff Won:
A prima facie case has been made out and potential delay would defeat the purpose of the application.
A prima facie case has been made out and potential delay would defeat the purpose of the application.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
A prima facie case has been made out and potential delay would defeat the purpose of the application.
A prima facie case has been made out and potential delay would defeat the purpose of the application.
Supporting Evidence
The court is satisfied that a prima facie case has been made out and that issuing notice would cause delays.
Judgment Evidence:
I am satisfied that a prima facie case has been made out and if notice issued delay will occurred and the same would defeat the very purpose of the above application. Hence ad interim injunction is granted.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Aniyamma Thomas
- Party Age
- 61
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Thomas
- Party Age
- 73
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Jomon Thomas
- Party Age
- 43
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- T.N.Rajesh
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Injunction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Ad interim injunction restraining the defendant from altering item No.3 Plaint schedule property and from destroying its boundary and from committing its trespass or mischief and waste in plaint schedule property item No.3 until further order.
Evidence:
I am satisfied that a prima facie case has been made out and if notice issued delay will occurred and the same would defeat the very purpose of the above application. Hence ad interim injunction is granted and restraining the defendant from altering item No.3 Plaint schedule property and from destroying its boundary and from committing its trespass or mischief and waste in plaint schedule property item No.3 until further order.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Injunction
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS
Case Code Year
2025