Case Summary
This case involves a restoration petition by the plaintiffs to reinstate a previously dismissed suit that sought a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants regarding a scheduled pathway. The plaintiffs argue they were not ready for trial due to outstanding evidence.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The petition lacked merit as the suit had been dismissed multiple times due to the plaintiffs' failure to present evidence.
The petition lacked merit as the suit had been dismissed multiple times due to the plaintiffs' failure to present evidence.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence, I am of the opinion that this petition is liable to be dismissed and is therefore dismissed.
Parties Involved
Plaintiffs
Anil Kumar (Age not specified years)
Chettiparambil House, Thareparambil Lane, P. J Antony Road, Palarivattom, Mamangalam P. O, Edappally Thekku Village, Ernakulam.
P. M Thankamany (Age not specified years)
Kodampurath House, Thareparambil Lane, P. J Antony Road, Palarivattom, Mamangalam P.O, Edappally Thekku Village, Ernakulam.
Ramony (Age not specified years)
Thareparambil House, Thareparameter Lane, P. J Antony Road, Palarivattom, Mamangalam P.O, Edappally Thekku Village, Ernakulam.
Sominy (Age not specified years)
Thareparambil House, Thareparambil Lane, P. J Antony Road, Palarivattom, Mamangalam P.O, Edappally Thekku Village, Ernakulam.
Defendants
Sasidharan (70 years years)
Thareparambil House, Thareparambil Lane, P. J Antony Road, Palarivattom, Mamangalam P.O, Edappally Thekku Village, Ernakulam.
Corporation of Kochi (Age not specified years)
Corporation office, Kochi -11.
T. E Raveendran (Age not specified years)
Thareparambil House, Thareparambil Lane, P. J Antony Road, Palarivattom, Mamangalam P.O, Edappally Thekku Village, Ernakulam.
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Permanent Injunction
Outcome:
Refused
Description:
Restoration of the suit to restrain the first defendant and his henchmen from restraining into the schedule pathway and from constructing a compound wall.
Evidence:
Hence, I am of the opinion, on a perusal of the entire proceedings of the case, that there is no merit in the petition advanced by the plaintiffs and that the petition lacks any bonafide to succeed.