Case Summary
The petitioner, Alphonsa Thomas, is seeking compliance with a rent control order against the respondent, Sanal Kumar N. The respondent has failed to comply with the court's directions regarding rent arrears.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Direction to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building forthwith.
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court found that the respondent had not fully complied with the previous rent arrears order. The case was closed with a directive to put the petitioner in vacant possession.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The respondent failed to comply with the court's order regarding rent arrears.
The respondent failed to comply with the court's order regarding rent arrears.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The full bench of the Hon'ble High court ... the tenant becomes fully aware that unless sufficient cause has been shown for default committed, the consequence ... would follow automatically.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence an order is passed under Section 12(3) of the act stopping all the further proceedings in the rent control petition and directing the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building forthwith.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Alphonsa Thomas
- Party Age
- 68
- Relation
- W/o. late VA Thomas
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sanal Kumar N.
- Relation
- S/o T. Kannan Nair
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- M.P. Ramnath
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- P. Rajesh Kottakkal
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Varghese Varghese. M.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sandhya S.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Bepin Paul
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Shalu Varghese
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Antony Tharian
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Pooja Krishna K.B.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Shanti John
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Rajasree R.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Possession
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Directing the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building forthwith.
Evidence:
Hence an order is passed under Section 12(3) of the act stopping all the further proceedings in the rent control petition and directing the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building forthwith.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between Alphonsa Thomas vs Sanal Kumar N. regarding rent non-compliance
Case Code Year
Case between Alphonsa Thomas vs Sanal Kumar N. regarding rent non-compliance