R.C.P. No. 72/2022

Case between Alphonsa Rajan vs Sanjitha V.S. regarding rent control

Court

THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER

Judge

SMT. REEJA R. NAIR

Order Date

2024-06-20

Duration

approximately-1 year 4 months

Case Closed

Thu, 06/20/2024 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The petitioner is Alphonsa Rajan, seeking compliance from the respondent Sanjitha V.S. regarding non-payment of rent arrears. The court found that the respondent failed to comply with prior orders, leading to the conclusion of the petition.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won

Interim Order

The court stopped all further proceedings and directed the respondent to hand over possession of the property to the petitioner due to non-compliance with the court order.

Judgment Favored

Plaintiff

Relief Granted

Directed respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building.

Case Type

Rent Control Petition

Final Judgment

The court stopped all further proceedings and directed the respondent to hand over possession of the property to the petitioner due to non-compliance with the court order.

Why Plaintiff Won:
The respondent failed to comply with the order for rent payment.

Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The respondent failed to comply with the order for rent payment.

Supporting Evidence

The respondent failed to comply with the order in IA 02/2023 nor shown any show cause.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence an order is passed under Section 12(3) of the Act stopping all the further proceedings in the rent control petition and directing the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building forthwith.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Alphonsa Rajan
Party Age: 69
Relation: W/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Sanjitha V.S.
Party Age: 39
Relation: W/o

Plaintiffs Documents

Affidavit of non-compliance.

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Sobhan George
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Subi K.
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Sreelakshmi Sabu
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Possession

Outcome: Granted

Description:

Directing the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building.

Evidence:

an order is passed under Section 12(3) of the Act stopping all the further proceedings in the rent control petition and directing the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building forthwith.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification