Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 107 OF 2014

Case between Alavikutty vs KASMI HAJI ET AL regarding Injunction

Court
MUNSIFF COURT OF TIRUR
Judge
Sri. JANKISH NARAYANAN
Order Date
2019-11-18
Duration
5 years 251 days
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Injunction suit filed by Alavikutty against multiple parties for blocking a pathway to property inherited from Kunhimuhamed Haji.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
Plaintiff's claims of pathway obstruction not proven. Suit dismissed with costs.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
Plaintiff's claims of pathway obstruction not proven. Suit dismissed with costs.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Alavikutty
Party Age
62
Relation
S/o. Valiyapeediyekkal Muhammed
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Kasmi Haji
Relation
S/o. Thadathil Chekku Haji
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Beevi
Party Age
75
Relation
W/o. Thadathil Kasmi Haji
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mohammed Haneefa
Party Age
58
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Jameela
Party Age
56
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Abdussalam
Party Age
54
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ramla
Party Age
52
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Arifa
Party Age
50
Plaintiffs Documents
23-10-2013 Jenm Assignment Deed, 12-04-1996 Certified Copy of Kanam Assignment Deed No.1638/1946, and more
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
M.K.Moosakutty
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
P.P.Ravoof
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
S.Hariharan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Plaintiff sought injunction against defendant
Evidence:
The plaintiff has failed to prove that B schedule way is in existence and he is entitled to use the same as matter of right

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Jenm Assignment Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Plaintiff's ownership of A schedule property
Reference:
A1
Document Type: Certified copy of Kanam Assignment Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Southern boundary of A schedule property as pathway
Reference:
A2
Document Type: Certified Copy of Jenm Assignment deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Evidence for existence of B schedule way
Reference:
A6
Document Type: Certified Copy of Partition Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Partition of properties among legal heirs
Reference:
A7

Case Classification

Case Type
Injunction
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Boundary Dispute
Case Code
Case between Alavikutty vs KASMI HAJI ET AL regarding Injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Alavikutty vs KASMI HAJI ET AL regarding Injunction

Quick Facts

Location
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Fri, 11/01/2019 - 12:00
To
Sat, 11/30/2019 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Kottekkunnu Sree Durga Devi Kshethra Committee et al vs Gopalakrishnan et al regarding injunction.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Injunction Defendant Won
Case between Arakkal Veettil Moosa vs Kuroor Hamza et al regarding injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Janardhanan et al vs Kerala State Electricity Board et al regarding injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Injunction Defendant Won
Case between Kamarudheen vs T.H. Abdurahiman regarding injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Injunction Defendant Won
Case between Kandanath Vadakke Veettil Madhavi Amma's daughter, K.V.Vijayalakshmi Amma vs Kamalavathi K et al regarding Unlawful Use of Property
THE MUNSIFF COURT OF TIRUR
Injunction Plaintiff Won