Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S 278/2024

Case between Ajithkumar R. vs Sebastian V.S. regarding Compromise of suit

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Judge
Smitha Susan Mathew
Order Date
2025-03-19
Duration
Case Code No.
278
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Ajithkumar R. is the plaintiff and Sebastian V.S. is the defendant. The case involves a compromise petition which was agreed upon by both parties.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court recorded the terms of the compromise and decreed the suit in accordance with the compromise.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Refund court fee as per rules
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court recorded the terms of the compromise and decreed the suit in accordance with the compromise.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The terms of compromise are lawful and agreed upon by both parties.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The terms of compromise are lawful and agreed upon by both parties.
Supporting Evidence
The terms of compromise are lawful.

Judgment Evidence:

The suit is decreed in terms of compromise. Compromise petition shall form part of the decree.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Ajithkumar R.
Party Age
68
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sebastian V.S.
Party Age
40
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
George Kurian
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Hima K. Mohan
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Anooja R.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The suit is decreed in terms of compromise.
Evidence:
Compromise is recorded.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Refund court fee as per rules.
Evidence:
Refund court fee as per rules.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Compromise petition
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
The terms of compromise are lawful and recorded as part of the decree.
Reference:

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kanjirappally
Common Reasons
Case Code
O.S
Case Code Year
2024

Quick Facts

Location
Kanjirappally
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kanjirappally
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sat, 03/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 04/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Abraham Mathew et al vs Suresh Raman et al regarding suit dismissal
Court of the Munsiff, Kanjirappally
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Union Bank of India vs Dhanya S., Silamban M. et al regarding non-payment of court fee.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Anilkumar vs Chirakkadavu Grama Panchayath regarding withdrawal of suit.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Joseph Antony et al vs C. M. M Educational and Charitable Trust regarding Interlocutory Application
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Anilkumar vs Chirakkadavu Grama Panchayat regarding withdrawal of suit.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won