Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S 268/2023

Case between Abraham Mathew et al vs Suresh Raman et al regarding Release of vehicle.

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Judge
Smitha Susan Mathew
Order Date
2025-02-07
Duration
Case Code No.
268
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The petitioners, Abraham Mathew and Martin Mathew, filed a petition concerning the release of a vehicle. The respondents are Suresh Raman and Abhilash S. The matter has been settled and no further action is needed.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the petition for the release of the vehicle, noting that the matter was settled.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the petition for the release of the vehicle, noting that the matter was settled.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The matter is settled, and the vehicle is already released.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The matter is settled, and the vehicle is already released.
Supporting Evidence
The matter is settled, and the vehicle is already released.

Judgment Evidence:

I.A. is allowed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Abraham Mathew
Party Age
45
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Martin Mathew
Party Age
43
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Suresh Raman
Party Age
40
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Abhilash S.
Party Age
50
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
K.A. George
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Vaisakh S. Nair
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Bilu G.
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Shamon Shaji
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Prasanth P. Prabha
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
I.A. is allowed.
Evidence:
Both parties are represented. Plaintiff filed this petition The vehicle is already released. The matter is settled, No purpose in continuing the attachment.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kanjirappally
Common Reasons
Case Code
O.S
Case Code Year
2023

Quick Facts

Location
Kanjirappally Taluk
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kanjirappally
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 02/28/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Abraham Mathew et al vs Suresh Raman et al regarding suit dismissal
Court of the Munsiff, Kanjirappally
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Union Bank of India vs Dhanya S., Silamban M. et al regarding non-payment of court fee.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Anilkumar vs Chirakkadavu Grama Panchayath regarding withdrawal of suit.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Joseph Antony et al vs C. M. M Educational and Charitable Trust regarding Interlocutory Application
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Anilkumar vs Chirakkadavu Grama Panchayat regarding withdrawal of suit.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won