Case Summary
Abdurahiman filed a suit against Moideen and others seeking partition, but the suit was dismissed for default as no evidence was presented by the plaintiff.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Unknown
Case Type
Partition Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed for default as no evidence was presented by the plaintiff.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Hence suit is dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Abdurahiman
- Party Age
- 59
- Relation
- S/o. Moideenkutty
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Moideen
- Party Age
- 45
- Relation
- S/o. Moideenkutty
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Kouja
- Party Age
- 60
- Relation
- D/o. Moideenkutty
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Nabeesa
- Party Age
- 55
- Relation
- D/o. Moideenkutty
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Kunheema
- Party Age
- 50
- Relation
- D/o. Moideenkutty
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. A. Mamu
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. P. Abdul Gafoor
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. E.K. Ashraf Sulaiman
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Partition Suit
Category
Family Property and Partition
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Partition Dispute
Case Code
Case between Abdurahiman vs Moideen et al regarding partition
Case Code Year
Case between Abdurahiman vs Moideen et al regarding partition