O.S. No.441/2019

Case between Abdul Shakoor vs Greater Cochin Development Authority et al regarding suit dismissal for default.

Court

II Additional Munsiff

Judge

Smt. Maneesha K Bhadran

Order Date

2024-03-02

Duration

Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This case involves Abdul Shakoor as the plaintiff and the Greater Cochin Development Authority along with its Executive Committee as defendants. The plaintiff was repeatedly absent, leading to the dismissal of the suit for default.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won

Interim Order

The suit filed by Abdul Shakoor was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's repeated absence and lack of representation.

Judgment Favored

Defendant

Relief Granted

Case Type

Civil Suit

Final Judgment

The suit filed by Abdul Shakoor was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's repeated absence and lack of representation.

Key Reasoning:
Plaintiff was not interested in proceeding with the suit.

Why Defendant Won:
Plaintiff was not interested in proceeding with the suit.

Supporting Evidence

Plaintiff absent. No representation.

Judgment Evidence:

Satisfied plaintiff is not interested in proceeding with suit. Suit dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Abdul Shakoor
Party Age: 53
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Greater Cochin Development Authority
Relation: represented by its Secretary

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: The Executive Committee, Greater Cochin Development Authority
Relation: represented by its President

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: R. Muraleedharan
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: T.P. Ramesh Thengumpillil
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other

Outcome: Dismissed

Description:

Suit dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of interest in proceeding.

Evidence: