Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No.441/2019

Case between Abdul Shakoor vs Greater Cochin Development Authority et al regarding suit dismissal for default.

Court
II Additional Munsiff
Judge
Smt. Maneesha K Bhadran
Order Date
2024-03-02
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This case involves Abdul Shakoor as the plaintiff and the Greater Cochin Development Authority along with its Executive Committee as defendants. The plaintiff was repeatedly absent, leading to the dismissal of the suit for default.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit filed by Abdul Shakoor was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's repeated absence and lack of representation.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiff was not interested in proceeding with the suit.

Judgment Evidence:

Satisfied plaintiff is not interested in proceeding with suit. Suit dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Abdul Shakoor (53 years) C.C. No. XIII/1110, Chullikkal, Thoppumpady Village, Kochi Taluk, Ernakulam District, Pin – 682 005, now residing at Konnoth House, Perumannoor.P.O., Cochin, Pin – 682 015.

Defendants

Greater Cochin Development Authority (Age not specified years) GCDA Administrative Building, Kadavanthra, Ernakulam, Kochi, Pin – 682 020, Elamkulam Village, Ernakulam District. The Executive Committee, Greater Cochin Development Authority (Age not specified years) GCDA Administrative Building, Kadavanthra, Elamkulam Village, Ernakulam District, Kochi, Pin – 682 020.

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Suit dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of interest in proceeding.
Evidence:
Satisfied plaintiff is not interested in proceeding with suit. Suit dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Government

Similar Cases