Case Summary
Abdul Razak filed a suit for partition against Kunhayamu and his children. The suit was dismissed as the plaintiff was absent.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Unknown
Case Type
Partition Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit for partition was dismissed as the plaintiff was absent during the hearing.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Suit for partition. The counsel for plaintiff reported that he has no instruction from his client. Name of the plaintiff is called absent. Hence suit is dismissed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Abdul Razak
- Party Age
- 50
- Relation
- S/o. Kunhayamu@ Ahamedkutty Haji
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Kunhayamu@ Ahamedkutty Haji's Children
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Saudath
- Party Age
- 40
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Partition Suit
Category
Family Property and Partition
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Abdul Razak vs Kunhayamu and Others regarding partition
Case Code Year
Case between Abdul Razak vs Kunhayamu and Others regarding partition