Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
R.C.P. No. 92/2024

Case between Abdul Latheef vs Pradeep Kumar T.V. regarding Rent Control

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Judge
SMT. REEJA R. NAIR
Order Date
2024-11-27
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Abdul Latheef filed a rent control petition against Pradeep Kumar T.V. for issues concerning rental agreements. The parties have entered into a compromise, which has been accepted by the court.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the rent control petition based on the terms of the compromise agreed upon by both parties. The final order includes the terms of the compromise.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Rent Control
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the rent control petition based on the terms of the compromise agreed upon by both parties. The final order includes the terms of the compromise.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The compromise terms were lawful and voluntarily agreed upon by both parties.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Heard both sides. Perused the terms and found it lawful and signed by both parties.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence IA 02/2024 is allowed. Rent control petition is allowed in terms of compromise.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Abdul Latheef
Party Age
61
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Pradeep Kumar T.V.
Party Age
53
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Winston K.V.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Jacob Sebastian
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sam Isaac Pothiyil
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Suraja S.
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Anatha Krishnan
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Rent control petition is allowed in terms of compromise.
Evidence:
Hence IA 02/2024 is allowed. Rent control petition is allowed in terms of compromise.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Compromise petition
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Court allowed the compromise petition and the terms were found lawful and signed by both parties.
Reference:
IA 02/2024

Case Classification

Case Type
Rent Control
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Abdul Latheef vs Pradeep Kumar T.V. regarding Rent Control
Case Code Year
Case between Abdul Latheef vs Pradeep Kumar T.V. regarding Rent Control

Case Flags

Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Fri, 11/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Sat, 11/30/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Thykoodam Edavaka Cristeeya Sangam vs Anta Builders and Developers Private Limited regarding Rent Control
THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Rent Control Plaintiff Won
Case between Suresh P., Subhadra Thampuran vs Zachariah Thomas T. regarding Rent Control
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Rent Control Defendant Won
Case between Antony Jain M.C. vs Mini Baby regarding Rent Control
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Rent Control Plaintiff Won
Case between V.K. Raveendran vs Soumya Shyam regarding Rent Control
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Rent Control Defendant Won
Case between V.K. Raveendran vs Soumya Shyam regarding Rent Control
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Rent Control Plaintiff Won