Case Summary
Abdul Khadhar Haji filed a complaint against K.T. Abdul Nazar for an alleged offence under section 138 of the N.I. Act. The court found the accused not guilty and acquitted him.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Criminal Case
Final Judgment
No
The court determined that the complainant was not vigilant in pursuing the case, leading to the dismissal of the complaint. Consequently, the accused was acquitted.
Key Reasoning:
The complainant did not provide plausible explanations for multiple absences, leading to the case being dismissed.
The complainant did not provide plausible explanations for multiple absences, leading to the case being dismissed.
Why Defendant Won:
The complainant did not provide plausible explanations for multiple absences, leading to the case being dismissed.
The complainant did not provide plausible explanations for multiple absences, leading to the case being dismissed.
Supporting Evidence
I am satisfied that the complainant is not vigilant in pursuing the matter. Hence, complaint is dismissed u/s 256(1) Cr.P.C.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, the accused is acquitted u/s. 256(1) Cr.P.C. His bail bond stands cancelled and he is set at liberty.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Abdul Khadhar Haji
- Party Age
- 59
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- K.T. Abdul Nazar
- Party Age
- 44
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. M. Abdul Khadar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Shameer Babu
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Complaint dismissed due to absence of the complainant
Evidence:
Hence, complaint is dismissed u/s 256(1) Cr.P.C.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Exhibit
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Marked in cross examination
Reference:
Exb.P1 to Exbt. P5
Case Classification
Case Type
Criminal Case
Category
Cheque Bounce Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Cheque dishonour
Case Code
Case between Abdul Khadhar Haji vs K.T. Abdul Nazar regarding offence under N.I. Act
Case Code Year
Case between Abdul Khadhar Haji vs K.T. Abdul Nazar regarding offence under N.I. Act
Case Flags
Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque Dishonour under Section 138 N.I. Act