Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 313 OF 20 16

Case between Abdul Hameed vs Kunheerukutty Hajjumma et al regarding partition

Court
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Judge
Smt. VINCY.T.V.
Order Date
2017-12-21
Duration
Approximately 1 year
Case Closed
Thu, 12/21/2017 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Abdul Hameed filed a suit for partition against multiple defendants residing in Tirur Taluk, which was dismissed due to default as no steps were taken against one defendant.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit for partition was dismissed for default due to no steps taken against one defendant.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Unknown
Case Type
Partition Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit for partition was dismissed for default due to no steps taken against one defendant.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Suit for partition. No steps seen taken against D6. No representation for plaintiff. Hence dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Abdul Hameed
Party Age
53
Relation
S/o Muhammed @ Cheriya Bappu
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Kunheerukutty Hajjumma
Party Age
85
Relation
W/o. Muhamed @ Cheriya Bappu
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Abdul Kareem
Party Age
67
Relation
S/o. Muhammed
Plaintiffs Documents
Unknown
Defendants Documents
Unknown

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. P.K. Abdul Naseem
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Santhoshkumar
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. M.K. Moosakkutty
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Partition
Outcome: Not Decided
Description:
Partition of property
Evidence:
Suit for partition. No steps seen taken against D6. No representation for plaintiff. Hence dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Partition Suit
Category
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Partition Dispute
Case Code
Case between Abdul Hameed vs Kunheerukutty Hajjumma et al regarding partition
Case Code Year
Case between Abdul Hameed vs Kunheerukutty Hajjumma et al regarding partition

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Case Closed
Thu, 12/21/2017 - 12:00
From
Fri, 12/01/2017 - 12:00
To
Sun, 12/31/2017 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Paruthikkunnan Moideenkutty vs Paruthikunnan Hassan's Children et al regarding partition
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Partition Suit Defendant Won
Case between Chekkidinte Purakkal Ramlath vs Chekkidinte Purakkal Khalid's children regarding partition
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Partition Suit Defendant Won
Case between Poozhithara Hajira vs Thazhathepeediyekkal Kunhimuhammed's son: P.P. Hamzakkutty regarding partition
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Partition Suit Defendant Won
Case between Asiya vs Unneenkutty et al regarding partition
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Partition Suit Defendant Won
Case between Ramankutty vs Kudukkil Chanthu's Children regarding partition
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Partition Suit Defendant Won