Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
S.T. No: 73/2017

Case between Abdul Gafoor vs Mustaffa regarding dishonour of cheque

Court
Court of Judicial First Class Magistrate-II
Judge
Smt. Vincy T.V.
Order Date
2018-04-21
Duration
5 years
Case Closed
Sat, 04/21/2018 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Abdul Gafoor filed a complaint against Mustaffa under section 138 of Negotiable Instrument Act for dishonour of a cheque issued towards the discharge of a debt.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The accused, Mustaffa, was found not guilty of the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act and was acquitted under Section 255(1) of Cr.P.C.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Acquitted
Case Type
Criminal Case - Section 138 of N.I. Act
Final Judgment
No
The accused, Mustaffa, was found not guilty of the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act and was acquitted under Section 255(1) of Cr.P.C.
Key Reasoning:
Insufficient evidence to prove that the cheque was issued towards a legally enforceable debt.
Why Defendant Won:
Insufficient evidence to prove that the cheque was issued towards a legally enforceable debt.
Supporting Evidence
Point No.1 & 2: Abdul Gafoor failed to sufficiently prove that the cheque was issued by the accused for a legally enforceable debt and to discharge liability. The accused provided evidence of being out of the country during the alleged period, contradicting the complainant's claims.

Judgment Evidence:

ACCORDINGLY Point No.3: In view of the finding on point No.1 and 2, the accused cannot be held liable for the offence u/s 138 of The Negotiable Instruments Act. In the result the accused is found not guilty of the offence punishable u/s 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act. Hence he is acquitted u/s 255(1) Cr.P.C.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Abdul Gafoor
Party Age
57
Relation
Son of Muhammed Haji
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mustaffa
Party Age
38
Relation
Son of Mammutty Haji
Plaintiffs Documents
Cheque dated 04-06-2012, Memos from ICICI Bank and IDBI Bank, Lawyer notice, Postal receipt, Reply notice, Receipt dated 1-1-2012
Defendants Documents
Passport No. H 7255797, Pages 14, 15, and 22 of passport

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Adv. M.A.Ismail
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Muhammed Ashraf
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Acquittal
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Accused acquitted under section 255(1) Cr.P.C.
Evidence:
The accused is found not guilty of the offence punishable u/s 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act and hence acquitted under section 255(1) Cr.P.C.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Cheque
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Cheque dated 04-06-2012 presented for collection
Reference:
P1
Document Type: Passport
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Defendant's passport showed travel outside the country during the alleged transaction period.
Reference:
D1, D2, D3, D4

Case Classification

Case Type
Criminal Case - Section 138 of N.I. Act
Category
Cheque Bounce Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Failure to prove legally enforceable debt for cheque issuance
Case Code
Case between Abdul Gafoor vs Mustaffa regarding dishonour of cheque
Case Code Year
Case between Abdul Gafoor vs Mustaffa regarding dishonour of cheque

Case Flags

Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque Dishonour

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Mon, 06/04/2012 - 12:00
Case Closed
Sat, 04/21/2018 - 12:00
From
Sun, 04/01/2018 - 12:00
To
Mon, 04/30/2018 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Mohammed Abdulrahiman vs Mohammed Abdulla Kavungal regarding dishonour of cheque
Court of Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Tirur
Criminal Case - Section 138 of N.I. Act Defendant Won
Case between Senior Secondary MES Central School vs K.P. Muhammed Haneefa regarding dishonour of cheque
Court of Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Tirur
Criminal Case - Section 138 of N.I. Act Defendant Won
Case between Razikbabu vs Basheer Puthanveettil regarding N.I. Act offense
Court of Judicial First Class Magistrate -II, Tirur
Criminal Case - Section 138 of N.I. Act Defendant Won
Case between Jayakumar vs Abdul Azeez regarding dishonored cheque
Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Tirur
Criminal Case - Section 138 of N.I. Act Plaintiff Won
Case between Ganesan vs Suresh Kumar regarding dishonoured cheque
Court of Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Tirur
Criminal Case - Section 138 of N.I. Act Defendant Won