Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 192 OF 2017

Case between Abdul Gafoor vs Azeez et al regarding boundary fixation and injunction

Court
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Judge
Smt. VINCY.T.V.
Order Date
2018-04-07
Duration
1 year
Case Closed
Sat, 04/07/2018 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Abdul Gafoor filed a suit against Azeez and Mymoona seeking boundary fixation and injunction. The suit was dismissed due to the absence of the plaintiff during the hearing.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed for default due to the absence of the plaintiff.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Not Decided
Case Type
Civil Suit - Boundary fixation and Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed for default due to the absence of the plaintiff.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Explain the main legal or evidentiary reason stated by the court for granting or refusing relief.

Judgment Evidence:

Suit for fixation of boundary and injunction. The counsel for the plaintiff reported that he has no instruction from his client. Name of the plaintiff is called. Absent. Hence suit is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Abdul Gafoor
Party Age
43
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Azeez
Party Age
65
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mymoona
Party Age
45
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Not mentioned
Defendants Documents
Not mentioned

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.M.K.Moosakutty
Appearance Type
Unknown
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.E.Muhammed Basheer
Appearance Type
Unknown
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Smt.Sabeena.P.M.
Appearance Type
Unknown

Reliefs

Relief Type: Fixation of boundary and Injunction
Outcome: Not Decided
Description:
Abdul Gafoor sought the fixation of boundary and injunction against Azeez and Mymoona.
Evidence:
The counsel for the plaintiff reported that he has no instruction from his client. Name of the plaintiff is called. Absent. Hence suit is dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit - Boundary Fixation and Injunction
Category
Injunction and Access Rights
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Abdul Gafoor vs Azeez et al regarding boundary fixation and injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Abdul Gafoor vs Azeez et al regarding boundary fixation and injunction

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Fri, 04/07/2017 - 12:00
Case Closed
Sat, 04/07/2018 - 12:00
From
Sun, 04/01/2018 - 12:00
To
Mon, 04/30/2018 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Vadkumpurath Palliyalil Santhakumari et al vs Thudimmal Abbas et al regarding boundary fixation and injunction
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Boundary Fixation and Injunction Dismissed
Case between Alamchambattu Bava Haji vs Abdul Rasheed et al regarding boundary fixation and injunction
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Boundary Fixation and Injunction Defendant Won
Case between Kunhimoideen vs Muhammed et al regarding boundary fixation and injunction
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Boundary Fixation and Injunction Defendant Won
Case between Eingapadalil Kadeeja et al vs Chenganakattil Abdurahiman et al regarding boundary fixation and injunction
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Boundary Fixation and Injunction Defendant Won
Case between Kacheri Kallichath Ismail et al vs Pathumma et al regarding boundary fixation and injunction
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Boundary Fixation and Injunction Plaintiff Won