Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
Restor. 2324/2017

Case between Abdul Asees vs Rahmath regarding relief petition

Court
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Judge
Sri. Sanu C
Order Date
2017-11-18
Duration
0 years, 1 months, 11 days
Case Code No.
2324
Case Closed
Sat, 11/18/2017 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

A 1-year-old petitioner Abdul Asees filed a relief petition against respondent Rahmath regarding non-appearance before the court.

Judgment Outcome

Partial Relief
Interim Order
The petition stands allowed on payment of a cost of Rs.2500 due to lack of sufficient reasons for non-appearance.
Judgment Favored
Petitioner
Relief Granted
Allowed on payment of cost of Rs.2500
Case Type
Civil Petition - Relief
Final Judgment
No
The petition stands allowed on payment of a cost of Rs.2500 due to lack of sufficient reasons for non-appearance.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Reason not clearly mentioned.
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Counter filed stating that sufficient time was served for steps and on 16/9/2017 allowed. It is posted for trial plaintiff was present. There is no sufficient reason stated for non-appearance of petitioner before court. But, in order to get to be adjudication and to get a relief on meritorious ground I am inclined to allow this petition. But since there is no sufficient reason, it can only be allowed on terms. Hence stands allowed on payment of cost of Rs.2500/-. For payment. Hence IA allowed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Abdul Asees
Party Age
1
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Rahmath
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Reliefs

Relief Type: Relief Petition
Outcome: Allowed on payment of cost of Rs.2500
Description:
Petition stands allowed on payment of cost of Rs.2500.
Evidence:
Counter filed stating that sufficient time was served for steps and on 16/9/2017 allowed. It is posted for trial plaintiff was present. There is no sufficient reason stated for non-appearance of petitioner before court. But, in order to get to be adjudication and to get a relief on meritorious ground I am inclined to allow this petition. But since there is no sufficient reason, it can only be allowed on terms. Hence stands allowed on payment of cost of Rs.2500/-. For payment. Hence IA allowed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Petition - Relief
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
RESTOR.
Case Code Year
2017

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur, Malappuram
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Sat, 10/07/2017 - 12:00
Case Closed
Sat, 11/18/2017 - 12:00
From
Wed, 11/01/2017 - 12:00
To
Thu, 11/30/2017 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Nedumbarambil Abdul Latheef vs Adimaparambil Abdul Razaq regarding undisclosed matter
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Unknown Dismissed
Case between Kalamannayil Kunhalavi vs Chenath Shukkoor and Others regarding Unknown
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Kalamannayil Kunhalavi vs Chenath Shukkoor et al regarding compliance of directions
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Civil Miscellaneous Appeal Plaintiff Won
Case between Vylisseri Shamsudheen et al vs Kalluvettikkal Kunhimarakkar et al regarding petition allowance
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kamalakshi Amma vs Rajasekharan et al regarding petition for exparte order
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Civil Suit - Exparte Order Plaintiff Won