Case Summary
Petitioner Kalamannayil Kunhalavi filed a petition seeking compliance with directions in CMA.28/13, which was allowed by the court.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Compliance with directions
Case Type
Civil Miscellaneous Appeal
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the petition seeking compliance with directions.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
The petition complied directions in CMA.28/13. Hence the petition stands allowed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Kalamannayil Kunhalavi
- Relation
- Representative of
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Chenath Shukkoor
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Jameela
Plaintiffs Documents
Compliance directions in CMA.28/13
Defendants Documents
Unknown
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- M.A.M.Rafeek
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- C.M.T.Fameesha
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Not mentioned
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Compliance
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Compliance with directions in CMA.28/13
Evidence:
The petition complied directions in CMA.28/13. Hence the petition stands allowed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Miscellaneous Appeal
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
RESTOR.
Case Code Year
2011