Case Summary
Petitioner Pathumol filed a petition against respondents Suhara, Kunhan Bava, and Husain seeking action, but the case was dismissed for default.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Not mentioned
Case Type
Civil Suit - Default Dismissal
Final Judgment
No
The petition was dismissed for default as no notice was issued to respondents.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
No batta paid to issue notice to respondents. Hence the petition is dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Pathumol
- Party Age
- 52
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Suhara
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Kunhan Bava
- Party Age
- 52
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Husain
Plaintiffs Documents
Not mentioned
Defendants Documents
Not mentioned
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- E.M.Purushothaman
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Advocate
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Not mentioned
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
Not mentioned
Evidence:
No batta paid to issue notice to respondents. Hence the petition is dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit - Default Dismissal
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
RESTOR.
Case Code Year
2014