Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
S.T. No:19/2017

Case between Abdu Rahman vs Mohammed A. C regarding cheque dishonor

Court
COURT OF JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE -II, TIRUR
Judge
Sri. Jankish Narayanan
Order Date
2019-09-23
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This case involves a complaint filed by Abdu Rahman against Mohammed A. C for the dishonor of a cheque issued under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The complainant alleges that the cheque was returned due to insufficient funds.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The accused, Mohammed A. C, was found guilty of issuing a cheque that was dishonored due to insufficient funds. He was sentenced to imprisonment and ordered to pay compensation to the complainant.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Compensation of Rs.1,15,000/-
Case Type
Criminal Case
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The complainant successfully proved the execution of the cheque and the legal enforceability of the debt.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, accused is sentenced to suffer imprisonment till the raising of the Court and to pay compensation of Rs.115,000/- (Rupees One Lakh and Fifteen Thousand only)...

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Abdu Rahman (48 years years) Thayyil House, Nerala P.O, Valavannur, Tirur Pin 676 551

Defendants

Mohammed A. C (Age not specified years) Koottamangalam, P.O Muttil, Wayanad, PIN: 673 122

Reliefs

Relief Type: Damages
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Compensation to be paid by the accused to the complainant.
Evidence:
Accused is directed to pay compensation of Rs.1,15,000/- to the complainant u/s 357 (3) of Cr.P.C.
Relief Type: Imprisonment
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Simple imprisonment in case of default in payment of compensation.
Evidence:
In default of payment of compensation, the accused shall undergo simple imprisonment for a period of 3 months.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Cheque
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The cheque issued by the accused for discharging a legally enforceable debt.
Reference:
Ext.P1
Document Type: Bank Memorandum
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Indicates that the cheque was returned due to insufficient funds.
Reference:
Ext.P2
Document Type: Bank Memorandum
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Another memorandum issued related to the cheque presented.
Reference:
Ext.P3
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The notice sent to the accused demanding payment of the cheque amount.
Reference:
Ext.P4 (a)
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Evidence of the delivery of the lawyer's notice to the accused.
Reference:
Ext.P4 (b)
Document Type: Acknowledgment card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proof of receipt of the lawyer's notice by the accused.
Reference:
Ext.P5
Document Type: Receipts
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Documents claimed by the accused to show payments made towards the alleged loan.
Reference:
Exbt.D1 to D5

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases