Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 13 OF 2017

Abdul Khalid vs Pareekkutty et al regarding partition

Court
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Judge
Smt. Vincy.T.V.
Order Date
2017-09-16
Duration
Less than 1 year
Case Closed
Sat, 09/16/2017 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Abdul Khalid filed a suit for partition against multiple defendants. The suit was dismissed for non-compliance with the court's directions.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit for partition was dismissed due to non-compliance with court directions.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Not mentioned
Case Type
Partition Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit for partition was dismissed due to non-compliance with court directions.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

No batta seen deposited as directed. Hence suit is dismissed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Abdul Khalid
Party Age
47
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Pareekkutty N.K.
Party Age
58
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Saidalavi
Party Age
49
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Abdul Salam
Party Age
48
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sainudheen
Party Age
45
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Abdul Kareem
Party Age
44
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Abdul Majeed
Party Age
47
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ramla
Party Age
42
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Subaida
Party Age
41
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sulaikha
Party Age
40
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Fathimakutty
Party Age
78
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Not mentioned
Defendants Documents
Not mentioned

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. K.H. Arshad Ayyoob
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Partition
Outcome: Not Decided
Description:
Request for partition of the property
Evidence:
No batta seen deposited as directed. Hence suit is dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Partition Suit
Category
Family Property and Partition
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Abdul Khalid vs Pareekkutty et al regarding partition
Case Code Year
Abdul Khalid vs Pareekkutty et al regarding partition

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Sat, 09/16/2017 - 12:00
Case Closed
Sat, 09/16/2017 - 12:00
From
Fri, 09/01/2017 - 12:00
To
Sat, 09/30/2017 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Ishaqe vs Kadiyummu Kutty et al regarding partition of property
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Partition Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Paruthikkunnan Moideenkutty vs Paruthikunnan Hassan's Children et al regarding partition
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Partition Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunhammu vs Alungal Muhammad's Children et al regarding partition
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Partition Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Thithikutty et al vs Beerankutty et al regarding partition
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Partition Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Chekkidinte Purakkal Ramlath vs Chekkidinte Purakkal Khalid's children regarding partition
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Partition Suit Defendant Won