| Niyamam AI- Beta

Displaying 3116 - 3120 of 9543

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Case between Dadha Pharma Distributors Private Limited vs Mr. Meenapallil Lakshmanan Arunya regarding realization of money

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 41/2021

Ernakulam

2025-03-01

approximately-4 years 6 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Jithesh P.T. vs Sreelakshmi K et al regarding transfer of case to Munsiff Court Tirur

Civil Suit

O.S No. 61/2024

Ernakulam

2025-03-01

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between State Bank of India vs Mr.Sajeev Peethambaran regarding realization of money

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 121/2022

Ernakulam

2025-03-01

approximately-3 years 7 months 15 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Leelamma et al vs P.B.Sivanandan regarding partition and permanent prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit

O.S No. 252/2016

Ernakulam District, Kerala

2025-03-01

approximately-8 years 11 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Pushkaran M.K. vs Nandakumar regarding non prosecution of the suit

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 350/2022

Ernakulam

2025-03-01

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

51%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 9,543 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 2.5 years

Settlement Likelihood 13%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 458 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 418 cases)
Sale deed (in 382 cases)
Postal receipt (in 246 cases)
Tax receipt (in 231 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 4912
Defendant Won: 3693

3693

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

27%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiff failed to pay necessary fees, resulting in case dismissal for default.

Found in 27 cases (27%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Insufficient evidence to demonstrate financial means or support the claim led to case dismissal.

Found in 24 cases (24%) High Impact

Failure to Take Necessary Steps

Plaintiffs did not take required procedural steps, leading to case dismissal for default.

Found in 21 cases (21%) High Impact

Absence of the Plaintiff in Court

Plaintiff's physical absence during hearings resulted in case dismissal for default.

Found in 14 cases (14%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Presented

Failure to Take Necessary Steps

Absence of the Plaintiff in Court

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?