Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.1559/2023

Case between Vijayalekshmi vs Vishnu S Nair et al regarding abatement of the suit due to plaintiff's death.

Court
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF- RCC
Judge
Smt.Salini.B
Order Date
2025-08-08
Duration
Case Code No.
1559
Case Closed
Fri, 08/08/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Vijayalekshmi filed a suit against Vishnu S Nair and others. The case was dismissed as abated because the plaintiff passed away and legal representatives were not brought on record.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed as abated due to the death of the plaintiff. The court allowed the application related to the abatement.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed as abated due to the death of the plaintiff. The court allowed the application related to the abatement.
Key Reasoning:
The suit was dismissed as there were no legal representatives brought on record after the plaintiff's death.
Why Defendant Won:
The suit was dismissed as there were no legal representatives brought on record after the plaintiff's death.
Supporting Evidence
Even though right to sue survives in a money suit after the death of sole plaintiff, the suit was liable to be abated.

Judgment Evidence:

this suit is liable to be abated as legal representatives are not brought on record within the period prescribed. Hence suit is dismissed as abated.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Vijayalekshmi
Party Age
58
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Vishnu S Nair
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Lekshmi.B
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Santha
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Anoop Nair
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Death certificate of plaintiff produced.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. V.A . Baburaj
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. V. Binukumar
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Ajun Krishna. U.S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Interim Application IA 3/25 is allowed.
Evidence:
IA 3/25 is allowed.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Death Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Provided to indicate the plaintiff's passing and that the suit is liable to be abated.
Reference:

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2023

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
Fri, 08/08/2025 - 12:00
From
Fri, 08/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India et al vs Midhun. M regarding rejection of plaint
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Purushothaman Pillay Divakaran et al vs Deepti Sivan regarding injunction
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sreenath.S vs Thankarajan et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sindhu.S et al vs Lalitha et al regarding withdrawal of suit
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Vanitha Sureshbabu Thilak vs Babu Chettiyar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won